Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1012.0005v2

Help | Advanced Search

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1012.0005v2 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 30 Nov 2010 (v1) , last revised 17 Dec 2010 (this version, v2)]

Title: Do spectra improve distance measurements of Type Ia supernovae?

Title: 超新星Ia的距离测量会因光谱而改善吗?

Authors:Stéphane Blondin, Kaisey S. Mandel, Robert P. Kirshner
Abstract: [Abridged] We investigate the use of a wide variety of spectroscopic measurements to determine distances to low-redshift Type Ia supernovae (SN Ia). We consider linear models for predicting distances to SN Ia using light-curve width and color parameters (determined using the SALT2 light-curve fitter) and a spectroscopic indicator, and evaluate the resulting Hubble diagram scatter using a cross-validation procedure. We confirm the ability of spectral flux ratios alone at maximum light to reduce the scatter of Hubble residuals by ~10% with respect to the standard combination of light-curve width and color. When used in combination with the SALT2 color parameter, the color-corrected flux ratio R^c(6420/5290) at maximum light leads to an even lower scatter, although the improvement has low statistical significance (<2 sigma) given the size of our sample (26 SN Ia). We highlight the importance of an accurate relative flux calibration and the failure of this method for highly-reddened objects. Comparison with synthetic spectra from 2D delayed-detonation explosion models shows that the correlation of R(6630/4400) with SN Ia absolute magnitudes can be largely attributed to intrinsic color variations and not to reddening by dust in the host galaxy. We consider flux ratios at other ages, as well as the use of pairs of flux ratios, revealing the presence of small-scale intrinsic spectroscopic variations in the iron-group dominated absorption features around ~4300 A and ~4800 A. The best flux ratio overall is the color-corrected R^c(4610/4260) at t=-2.5d from maximum light, which leads to ~30% lower scatter with respect to the standard combination of light-curve width and color. We examine other spectroscopic indicators related to line-profile morphology, but none appear to lead to a significant improvement over the standard light-curve width and color parameters.
Abstract: 【摘要】我们研究了多种光谱测量方法用于确定低红移Ia型超新星(SN Ia)的距离。我们考虑了使用SALT2光变曲线拟合器确定的光变曲线宽度和颜色参数以及光谱指示器来预测SN Ia距离的线性模型,并通过交叉验证程序评估由此产生的哈勃图散度。我们证实了单一最大亮度下光谱通量比值能够使哈勃残差的散度相对于标准的光变曲线宽度和颜色组合降低约10%。当与SALT2颜色参数结合使用时,最大亮度下的色校正通量比值R^c(6420/5290)会导致更低的散度,尽管由于样本大小(26个SN Ia)的影响,这种改进的统计显著性较低(<2σ)。我们强调了准确的相对通量校准的重要性以及此方法对于高度消光物体的失效。与来自二维延迟引爆爆炸模型的合成光谱进行比较表明,R(6630/4400)与SN Ia绝对亮度的相关性主要归因于固有颜色变化而非宿主星系尘埃消光。我们还考虑了其他时间点的通量比值以及成对通量比值的使用,揭示了在大约4300 Å和4800 Å附近铁族主导吸收特征中的小尺度固有光谱变化。总体而言,最好的通量比值是从最大亮度前-2.5天开始的色校正R^c(4610/4260),与标准的光变曲线宽度和颜色组合相比,其散度降低了约30%。我们还检查了与线轮廓形态相关的其他光谱指示器,但没有发现它们能显著改善标准的光变曲线宽度和颜色参数。
Comments: Minor changes from v1: Note added in proof, small corrections to section 4.3.3. Accepted for publication in A&A. Spectroscopic data available at http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/supernova/SNarchive.html
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1012.0005 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1012.0005v2 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1012.0005
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Astron.Astrophys. 526 (2011) A81
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015792
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Stéphane Blondin [view email]
[v1] Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:00:30 UTC (1,721 KB)
[v2] Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:46:04 UTC (1,721 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2010-12
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号