Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1412.0133v2

Help | Advanced Search

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1412.0133v2 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 29 Nov 2014 (v1) , last revised 8 Aug 2015 (this version, v2)]

Title: New constraints on $f(R)$ gravity from clusters of galaxies

Title: 来自星系团的$f(R)$引力的新约束

Authors:Matteo Cataneo (1,2), David Rapetti (1), Fabian Schmidt (3), Adam B. Mantz (4), Steven W. Allen (2), Douglas E. Applegate (5), Patrick L. Kelly (6), Anja von der Linden (1,2), R. Glenn Morris (2) ((1) Dark Cosmology Centre, (2) KIPAC Stanford/SLAC, (3) MPA, (4) KICP Chicago, (5) Bonn, (6) UC Berkeley)
Abstract: The abundance of massive galaxy clusters is a powerful probe of departures from General Relativity (GR) on cosmic scales. Despite current stringent constraints placed by stellar and galactic tests, on larger scales alternative theories of gravity such as $f(R)$ can still work as effective theories. Here we present constraints on two popular models of $f(R)$, Hu-Sawicki and "designer", derived from a fully self-consistent analysis of current samples of X-ray selected clusters and accounting for all the covariances between cosmological and astrophysical parameters. Using cluster number counts in combination with recent data from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and the CMB lensing potential generated by large scale structures, as well as with other cosmological constraints on the background expansion history and its mean matter density, we obtain the upper bounds $\log_{10}|f_{R0}| < 4.79$ and $\log_{10}B_0 < 3.75$ at the 95.4 per cent confidence level, for the Hu-Sawicki (with $n=1$) and designer models, respectively. The robustness of our results derives from high quality cluster growth data for the most massive clusters known out to redshifts $z \sim 0.5$, a tight control of systematic uncertainties including an accurate and precise mass calibration from weak gravitational lensing data, and the use of the full shape of the halo mass function over the mass range of our data.
Abstract: 大质量星系团的丰富度是探测宇宙尺度上偏离广义相对论(GR)的重要探针。 尽管目前恒星和星系测试已施加了严格的限制,但在更大的尺度上,如$f(R)$的替代引力理论仍可以作为有效理论。 在这里,我们展示了从当前X射线选择的星系团样本的完全自洽分析中得出的两个流行的$f(R)$模型——Hu-Sawicki 和“设计者”模型的约束,并考虑了宇宙学和天体物理参数之间的所有协方差。 利用星系团数量计数,结合来自宇宙微波背景(CMB)和由大尺度结构产生的CMB透镜势的最新数据,以及对背景膨胀历史和平均物质密度的其他宇宙学约束,我们分别得到了 Hu-Sawicki(带有$n=1$)和“设计者”模型在95.4%置信水平上的上限$\log_{10}|f_{R0}| < 4.79$和$\log_{10}B_0 < 3.75$。 我们结果的稳健性来自于对最巨大星系团在红移$z \sim 0.5$范围内的高质量星系团增长数据,对系统不确定性的严格控制,包括来自弱引力透镜数据的准确且精确的质量校准,以及在我们数据的质量范围内使用晕质量函数的完整形状。
Comments: 11 pages, 1 Table, 3 figures, matches published version on PRD
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1412.0133 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1412.0133v2 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.0133
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. D 92, 044009 (2015)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.044009
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Matteo Cataneo [view email]
[v1] Sat, 29 Nov 2014 18:12:04 UTC (555 KB)
[v2] Sat, 8 Aug 2015 11:33:22 UTC (362 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2014-12
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号