Title: Bohr's Relational Holism and the classical-quantum Interaction Show Chinese title

Title: 玻尔的关联整体论与经典-量子相互作用

Abstract: In this paper I present and critically discuss the main strategies that Bohr used and could have used to fend off the charge that his interpretation does not provide a clear-cut distinction between the classical and the quantum domain. In particular, in the first part of the paper I reassess the main arguments used by Bohr to advocate the indispensability of a classical framework to refer to quantum phenomena. In this respect, by using a distinction coming from an apparently unrelated philosophical corner, we could say that Bohr is not a revisionist philosopher of physics but rather a descriptivist one in the sense of Strawson. I will then go on discussing the nature of the holistic link between classical measurement apparatuses and observed system that he also advocated. The oft-repeated conclusion that Bohr's interpretation of the quantum formalism is untenable can only be established by giving his arguments as much force as possible, which is what I will try to do in the following by remaining as faithful as possible to his published work. Show Chinese abstract

Abstract: 本文中我提出并批判性地讨论了玻尔用来反驳其解释未能清晰区分经典领域与量子领域的指控的主要策略，以及他可能采用的策略。 特别是，在本文的第一部分，我重新评估了玻尔用来主张经典框架对于指涉量子现象不可或缺的主要论点。 就此而言，借用一个看似无关的哲学领域的区分，可以说玻尔并不是一位物理哲学的修正主义者，而更像斯特劳森意义上的描述主义者。 然后，我将进一步讨论他所倡导的经典测量仪器与被观测系统之间的整体性联系的本质。 经常重复的结论——即玻尔对量子形式主义的解释站不住脚——只能通过尽可能赋予他的论证以最大力度来确立，这也是我在下文尝试做的，尽可能忠实于他的已发表作品。