Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1805.00035v1

Help | Advanced Search

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1805.00035v1 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 30 Apr 2018 (this version) , latest version 31 Oct 2018 (v3) ]

Title: Hydrostatic mass profiles in X-COP galaxy clusters

Title: X-COP星系团的静压质量分布

Authors:S. Ettori, V. Ghirardini, D. Eckert, E. Pointecouteau, F. Gastaldello, M. Sereno, M. Gaspari, S. Ghizzardi, M. Roncarelli, M. Rossetti
Abstract: We present the reconstruction of the hydrostatic mass profiles in 13 X-ray luminous galaxy clusters that have been mapped in their X-ray and SZ signal out to $R_{200}$ for the XMM Cluster Outskirt Project (X-COP). Using profiles of the gas temperature, density and pressure that have been spatially resolved out to $0.9 R_{500}$, $1.8 R_{500}$, and $2.3 R_{500}$, respectively, we are able to recover the hydrostatic gravitating mass profile with several methods and using different mass models. The hydrostatic masses are recovered with a relative (statistical) error of 3% at $R_{500}$ and 6% at $R_{200}$. We evaluate some of the systematic uncertainties to be in the order of 5% at both $R_{500}$ and $R_{200}$. A Navarro-Frenk-White profile provides the best-fit in 9 cases, with the remaining four cases that do not show a statistically significant tension with it. The distribution of the mass concentration follows the correlations with the total mass predicted from numerical simulations with a scatter of 0.18 dex. We compare them with the estimates of the total gravitational mass obtained through X-ray scaling relations, and from weak lensing and galaxy dynamics techniques, and measure a substantial agreement with the results from scaling laws, from WL at both $R_{500}$ and $R_{200}$, from cluster velocity dispersions, but a significant tension with the caustic masses that tend to underestimate the hydrostatic masses by 40% at $R_{200}$. We also compare these measurements with predictions from alternative models to CDM, like the Emergent Gravity and MOND scenarios, confirming that the latter underestimates the hydrostatic masses by 40% at $R_{1000}$, with a decreasing tension as the radius increases, and reaches $\sim$15% at $R_{200}$, whereas the former reproduces $M_{500}$ within 10%, but overestimates $M_{200}$ by about 20%.
Abstract: 我们展示了对13个X射线明亮星系团的静压质量轮廓的重建,这些星系团已经在X射线和SZ信号方面被绘制出来,直至$R_{200}$,这是XMM星系团外围项目(X-COP)的一部分。 利用在空间上解析至$0.9 R_{500}$、$1.8 R_{500}$和$2.3 R_{500}$的气体温度、密度和压力轮廓,我们能够使用多种方法和不同的质量模型恢复静压引力质量轮廓。 在$R_{500}$处,静压质量的相对(统计)误差为3%,在$R_{200}$处为6%。 我们评估了一些系统不确定性,在$R_{500}$和$R_{200}$处约为5%。 Navarro-Frenk-White模型在9种情况下提供了最佳拟合,其余四种情况与该模型没有统计显著的矛盾。 质量浓度的分布遵循数值模拟预测的总质量相关性,离散度为0.18 dex。 我们将它们与通过X射线标度关系、弱引力透镜和星系动力学技术获得的总引力质量估计进行比较,发现与标度定律的结果、在$R_{500}$和$R_{200}$处的弱引力透镜结果以及团簇速度弥散的结果有显著的一致性,但与倾向于在$R_{200}$处低估静力质量40%的尖点质量存在显著矛盾。 我们还将这些测量结果与替代模型的预测进行了比较,如引 emergent gravity 和 MOND 场景,确认后者在$R_{1000}$处低估了流体静力质量 40%,随着半径增加,矛盾逐渐减小,并在$R_{200}$处达到$\sim$的 15%,而前者在$M_{500}$范围内重现了数据,但大约高估了$M_{200}$的 20%。
Comments: 12 pages, 8 figures, 3 tables. Submitted to A&A. This is one of the three companion papers (including Ghirardini et al. and Eckert et al.) on the X-COP sample. X-COP data products are available for download on https://www.astro.unige.ch/xcop
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1805.00035 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1805.00035v1 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.00035
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Stefano Ettori [view email]
[v1] Mon, 30 Apr 2018 18:00:47 UTC (776 KB)
[v2] Thu, 4 Oct 2018 08:41:03 UTC (783 KB)
[v3] Wed, 31 Oct 2018 12:03:23 UTC (785 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-05
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号