Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > econ > arXiv:2304.00456v1

Help | Advanced Search

Economics > General Economics

arXiv:2304.00456v1 (econ)
[Submitted on 2 Apr 2023 ]

Title: Life cycle costing analysis of deep energy retrofits of a mid-rise building to understand the impact of energy conservation measures

Title: 高层建筑深度节能改造的全生命周期成本分析,以了解节能措施的影响

Authors:Haonan Zhang
Abstract: Building energy retrofits have been identified as key to realizing climate mitigation goals in Canada. This study aims to provide a roadmap for existing mid-rise building retrofits in order to understand the required capital investment, energy savings, energy cost savings, and carbon footprint for mid-rise residential buildings in Canada. This study employed EnergyPlus to examine the energy performance of 11 energy retrofit measures for a typical multi-unit residential building (MURB) in Metro Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. The author employed the energy simulation software (EnergyPlus) to evaluate the pre-and post-retrofit operational energy performance of the selected MURB. Two base building models powered by natural gas (NG-building) and electricity (E-building) were created by SketchUP. The energy simulation results were combined with cost and emission impact data to evaluate the economic and environmental performance of the selected energy retrofit measures. The results indicated that the NG-building can produce significant GHG emission reductions (from 27.64 tCO2e to 3.77 tCO2e) by implementing these energy retrofit measures. In terms of energy savings, solar PV, ASHP, water heater HP, and HRV enhancement have great energy saving potential compared to other energy retrofit measures. In addition, temperature setback, lighting, and airtightness enhancement present the best economic performance from a life cycle perspective. However, windows, ASHP, and solar PV, are not economical choices because of higher life cycle costs. While ASHP can increase life cycle costs for the NG-building, with the financial incentives provided by the governments, ASHP could be the best choice to reduce GHG emissions when stakeholders make decisions on implementing energy retrofits.
Abstract: 建筑能效改造已被确定为实现加拿大气候减缓目标的关键。 本研究旨在为现有的中高层建筑改造提供路线图,以了解加拿大中高层住宅建筑所需的资本投资、能源节约、能源成本节约和碳足迹。 本研究采用EnergyPlus来评估不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华都会区典型多单元住宅建筑(MURB)的11项能源改造措施的能源性能。 作者使用能源模拟软件(EnergyPlus)评估了所选MURB的改造前后运行能源性能。 通过SketchUP创建了两个由天然气(NG-building)和电力(E-building)驱动的基础建筑模型。 能源模拟结果与成本和排放影响数据相结合,以评估所选能源改造措施的经济和环境性能。 结果显示,通过实施这些能源改造措施,NG-building可以显著减少温室气体排放(从27.64 tCO2e减少到3.77 tCO2e)。 在能源节约方面,太阳能光伏、空气源热泵、热水器热泵和热回收通风增强相比其他能源改造措施具有更大的节能潜力。 此外,从全生命周期的角度来看,温度设定调整、照明和气密性增强表现出最佳的经济性能。 然而,窗户、空气源热泵和太阳能光伏由于全生命周期成本较高,不是经济的选择。 虽然空气源热泵可能会增加NG-building的全生命周期成本,但考虑到政府提供的财政激励,当利益相关者在决定实施能源改造时,空气源热泵可能是减少温室气体排放的最佳选择。
Subjects: General Economics (econ.GN)
Cite as: arXiv:2304.00456 [econ.GN]
  (or arXiv:2304.00456v1 [econ.GN] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.00456
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Haonan Zhang [view email]
[v1] Sun, 2 Apr 2023 05:31:08 UTC (1,712 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
econ.GN
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-04
Change to browse by:
econ
q-fin
q-fin.EC

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号