Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > econ > arXiv:2304.10636

Help | Advanced Search

Economics > General Economics

arXiv:2304.10636 (econ)
[Submitted on 20 Apr 2023 (v1) , last revised 27 Jun 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title: The quality of school track assignment decisions by teachers

Title: 教师在学校田径队分配决策中的质量

Authors:Joppe de Ree, Matthijs Oosterveen, Dinand Webbink
Abstract: This paper analyzes the effects of educational tracking and the quality of track assignment decisions. We motivate our analysis using a model of optimal track assignment under uncertainty. This model generates predictions about the average effects of tracking at the margin of the assignment process. In addition, we recognize that the average effects do not measure noise in the assignment process, as they may reflect a mix of both positive and negative tracking effects. To test these ideas, we develop a flexible causal approach that separates, organizes, and partially identifies tracking effects of any sign or form. We apply this approach in the context of a regression discontinuity design in the Netherlands, where teachers issue track recommendations that may be revised based on test score cutoffs, and where in some cases parents can overrule this recommendation. Our results indicate substantial tracking effects: between 40% and 100% of reassigned students are positively or negatively affected by enrolling in a higher track. Most tracking effects are positive, however, with students benefiting from being placed in a higher, more demanding track. While based on the current analysis we cannot reject the hypothesis that teacher assignments are unbiased, this result seems only consistent with a significant degree of noise. We discuss that parental decisions, whether to follow or deviate from teacher recommendations, may help reducing this noise.
Abstract: 本文分析了教育分轨及其分轨决策质量的影响。 我们使用在不确定性下的最优分轨模型来驱动我们的分析。 该模型对分轨在分配过程边缘的平均影响产生了预测。 此外,我们认识到平均影响并不能衡量分配过程中的噪声,因为它们可能反映了正负分轨效应的混合。 为了验证这些想法,我们开发了一种灵活的因果方法,能够分离、组织并部分识别任何符号或形式的分轨效应。 我们在荷兰的回归不连续设计背景下应用这种方法,其中教师会提出分轨建议,这些建议可能根据考试成绩截止值进行修改,并且在某些情况下家长可以推翻这些建议。 我们的结果表明分轨影响显著:重新分配的学生中有40%到100%因进入更高轨道而受到积极或消极影响。 然而,大多数分轨影响是积极的,学生从被分配到更高、更具挑战性的轨道中受益。 虽然基于当前分析我们无法拒绝教师分配无偏的假设,但这一结果似乎仅与相当程度的噪声一致。 我们讨论了家长决定是否遵循或偏离教师建议,可能有助于减少这种噪声。
Subjects: General Economics (econ.GN)
Cite as: arXiv:2304.10636 [econ.GN]
  (or arXiv:2304.10636v2 [econ.GN] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.10636
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Joppe de Ree [view email]
[v1] Thu, 20 Apr 2023 20:29:27 UTC (1,209 KB)
[v2] Fri, 27 Jun 2025 22:15:41 UTC (101 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
q-fin
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-04
Change to browse by:
econ
econ.GN
q-fin.EC

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号