Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2502.09893v1

Help | Advanced Search

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:2502.09893v1 (physics)
[Submitted on 14 Feb 2025 ]

Title: Dynamic-Computed Tomography Angiography for Cerebral Vessel Templates and Segmentation

Title: 动态计算机断层扫描血管造影用于脑血管模板和分割

Authors:Shrikanth Yadav, Jisoo Kim, Geoffrey Young, Lei Qin
Abstract: Background: Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) is crucial for cerebrovascular disease diagnosis. Dynamic CTA is a type of imaging that captures temporal information about the We aim to develop and evaluate two segmentation techniques to segment vessels directly on CTA images: (1) creating and registering population-averaged vessel atlases and (2) using deep learning (DL). Methods: We retrieved 4D-CT of the head from our institutional research database, with bone and soft tissue subtracted from post-contrast images. An Advanced Normalization Tools pipeline was used to create angiographic atlases from 25 patients. Then, atlas-driven ROIs were identified by a CT attenuation threshold to generate segmentation of the arteries and veins using non-linear registration. To create DL vessel segmentations, arterial and venous structures were segmented using the MRA vessel segmentation tool, iCafe, in 29 patients. These were then used to train a DL model, with bone-in CT images as input. Multiple phase images in the 4D-CT were used to increase the training and validation dataset. Both segmentation approaches were evaluated on a test 4D-CT dataset of 11 patients which were also processed by iCafe and validated by a neuroradiologist. Specifically, branch-wise segmentation accuracy was quantified with 20 labels for arteries and one for veins. DL outperformed the atlas-based segmentation models for arteries (average modified dice coefficient (amDC) 0.856 vs. 0.324) and veins (amDC 0.743 vs. 0.495) overall. For ICAs, vertebral and basilar arteries, DL and atlas -based segmentation had an amDC of 0.913 and 0.402, respectively. The amDC for MCA-M1, PCA-P1, and ACA-A1 segments were 0.932 and 0.474, respectively. Conclusion: Angiographic CT templates are developed for the first time in literature. Using 4D-CTA enables the use of tools like iCafe, lessening the burden of manual annotation.
Abstract: 背景:计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)对于脑血管疾病的诊断至关重要。动态CTA是一种能够捕捉时间信息的成像方式。我们旨在开发和评估两种分割技术,直接在CTA图像上分割血管:(1)创建和注册人群平均血管图谱,以及(2)使用深度学习(DL)。方法:我们从机构研究数据库中获取了头部的4D-CT,从对比后图像中减去了骨组织和软组织。使用高级配准工具流程从25名患者创建了血管图谱。然后,通过CT衰减阈值识别图谱驱动的感兴趣区域,以非线性配准生成动脉和静脉的分割。为了创建DL血管分割,使用MRA血管分割工具iCafe在29名患者中分割了动脉和静脉结构。然后将这些用于训练DL模型,以含骨的CT图像作为输入。4D-CT中的多相图像用于增加训练和验证数据集。两种分割方法在11名患者的测试4D-CT数据集上进行了评估,这些数据也通过iCafe处理并由神经放射科医生验证。具体来说,使用20个动脉标签和一个静脉标签量化了分支级分割精度。总体而言,DL在动脉(平均修改的Dice系数(amDC)0.856 vs. 0.324)和静脉(amDC 0.743 vs. 0.495)方面优于基于图谱的分割模型。对于ICA、椎动脉和基底动脉,DL和基于图谱的分割的amDC分别为0.913和0.402。MCA-M1、PCA-P1和ACA-A1段的amDC分别为0.932和0.474。结论:首次在文献中开发了血管CT模板。使用4D-CTA可以使用iCafe等工具,减轻手动注释的负担。
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph) ; Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2502.09893 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:2502.09893v1 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.09893
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Shrikanth Yadav [view email]
[v1] Fri, 14 Feb 2025 03:33:04 UTC (29,231 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-02
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CV
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号