Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2504.02930

Help | Advanced Search

Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies

arXiv:2504.02930 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 3 Apr 2025 (v1) , last revised 5 Jul 2025 (this version, v4)]

Title: Describing the Nonuniversal Galaxy Merger Timescales in IllustrisTNG: Effects of Host Halo Mass, Baryons, and Sample Selection

Title: 描述IllustrisTNG中非普遍的星系并合时标:主晕质量、重子物质和样本选择的影响

Authors:Kun Xu (U Penn), Y.P. Jing (SJTU, TDLI)
Abstract: Galaxy merger timescales are crucial for understanding and modeling galaxy formation in our hierarchically structured Universe. However, previous studies have reported widely varying dependencies of merger timescales on initial orbital parameters and mass ratio at the first crossing of $r_{\rm vir}$. Using IllustrisTNG simulations, we find that these dependencies vary with host halo mass, suggesting that discrepancies in prior studies may arise from differences in the systems analyzed. Specifically, in low-mass halos, merger timescales show a stronger dependence on initial orbital parameters, while in high-mass halos, this dependence weakens. To account for these variations, we present a fitting formula that incorporates host mass dependence, achieving a logarithmic scatter smaller than 0.15 dex. Comparing dark matter-only and baryonic simulations, we observe similar merger timescales for circular orbits but notable differences for radial orbits. In halos with $M_{\rm{host}} < 10^{12.5} h^{-1} M_{\odot}$, mergers in dark matter-only runs take longer than in baryonic runs, whereas the trend reverses in more massive halos. We attribute these differences to the competing effects of tidal disruption by central galaxy disks and the resistance of baryonic satellites to tidal stripping. Finally, we extend our model to predict merger timescales from any starting radius within the halo. By fitting the extended model to the entire infall sample, we find that using only the merger sample can underestimate merger timescales, particularly for low mass ratios. Our model provides a valuable tool for improving semi-analytical and empirical models of galaxy formation.
Abstract: 星系合并时间尺度对于理解并模拟我们分层结构的宇宙中的星系形成至关重要。然而,先前的研究报告称,合并时间尺度在首次穿过$r_{\rm vir}$时对初始轨道参数和质量比的依赖性存在广泛差异。使用 IllustrisTNG 模拟,我们发现这些依赖性随着主机晕的质量而变化,这表明之前研究中的差异可能源于所分析系统的不同。具体来说,在低质量晕中,合并时间尺度对初始轨道参数的依赖性更强,而在高质量晕中,这种依赖性则减弱。为了考虑这些变化,我们提出了一种包含主机质量依赖性的拟合公式,实现了小于 0.15 dex 的对数散射。比较暗物质仅模拟和重子模拟,我们观察到对于圆形轨道的合并时间尺度相似,但对于径向轨道则有显著差异。在具有$M_{\rm{host}} < 10^{12.5} h^{-1} M_{\odot}$的晕中,暗物质仅模拟中的合并时间比重子模拟更长,而在更高质量的晕中,趋势则相反。我们将这些差异归因于中心星系盘的潮汐破坏作用和重子卫星对潮汐剥离的阻力之间的竞争效应。最后,我们将模型扩展为从晕内的任何起始半径预测合并时间尺度。通过将扩展模型拟合到整个吸积样本,我们发现仅使用合并样本可能会低估合并时间尺度,尤其是在低质量比的情况下。我们的模型为改进星系形成的半解析和经验模型提供了一个有价值的工具。
Comments: 21 pages, 17 figures. Accepted for Publication in ApJ. Models summarized in Table 1
Subjects: Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA) ; Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:2504.02930 [astro-ph.GA]
  (or arXiv:2504.02930v4 [astro-ph.GA] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.02930
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 986, 2025, Number 2
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/add5f6
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Kun Xu [view email]
[v1] Thu, 3 Apr 2025 18:00:00 UTC (1,638 KB)
[v2] Fri, 9 May 2025 16:07:13 UTC (1,644 KB)
[v3] Wed, 18 Jun 2025 16:06:32 UTC (1,638 KB)
[v4] Sat, 5 Jul 2025 20:50:00 UTC (1,638 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-04
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.GA

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号