Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2504.03877

Help | Advanced Search

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2504.03877 (cs)
[Submitted on 4 Apr 2025 ]

Title: Concept-based Rubrics Improve LLM Formative Assessment and Data Synthesis

Title: 基于概念的评分量表改善了LLM形成性评估和数据分析综合

Authors:Yuchen Wei, Dennis Pearl, Matthew Beckman, Rebecca J. Passonneau
Abstract: Formative assessment in STEM topics aims to promote student learning by identifying students' current understanding, thus targeting how to promote further learning. Previous studies suggest that the assessment performance of current generative large language models (LLMs) on constructed responses to open-ended questions is significantly lower than that of supervised classifiers trained on high-quality labeled data. However, we demonstrate that concept-based rubrics can significantly enhance LLM performance, which narrows the gap between LLMs as off-the shelf assessment tools, and smaller supervised models, which need large amounts of training data. For datasets where concept-based rubrics allow LLMs to achieve strong performance, we show that the concept-based rubrics help the same LLMs generate high quality synthetic data for training lightweight, high-performance supervised models. Our experiments span diverse STEM student response datasets with labels of varying quality, including a new real-world dataset that contains some AI-assisted responses, which introduces additional considerations.
Abstract: STEM领域的形成性评估旨在通过识别学生当前的理解来促进学生学习,从而确定如何进一步推动学习。 先前的研究表明,当前生成式大型语言模型(LLMs)在开放性问题的构建回答上的评估表现显著低于在高质量标注数据上训练的监督分类器。 然而,我们证明了基于概念的评分标准可以显著提高LLMs的表现,这缩小了LLMs作为即插即用评估工具与需要大量训练数据的小型监督模型之间的差距。 对于基于概念的评分标准能让LLMs表现出色的数据集,我们展示了这些基于概念的评分标准可以帮助相同的LLMs生成高质量的合成数据,用于训练轻量级、高性能的监督模型。 我们的实验涵盖了多样化的STEM学生响应数据集,包括一些带有AI辅助响应的新现实世界数据集,这些数据集引入了额外的考量因素。
Comments: 13 pages excluding references. 9 tables and 4 figures
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
ACM classes: I.2.7; K.3.1
Cite as: arXiv:2504.03877 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2504.03877v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.03877
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yuchen Wei [view email]
[v1] Fri, 4 Apr 2025 19:02:07 UTC (1,334 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-04
Change to browse by:
cs.LG

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号