Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2504.03888

Help | Advanced Search

Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction

arXiv:2504.03888 (cs)
[Submitted on 4 Apr 2025 ]

Title: Investigating Affective Use and Emotional Well-being on ChatGPT

Title: 探究ChatGPT的情感使用与情感福祉

Authors:Jason Phang, Michael Lampe, Lama Ahmad, Sandhini Agarwal, Cathy Mengying Fang, Auren R. Liu, Valdemar Danry, Eunhae Lee, Samantha W.T. Chan, Pat Pataranutaporn, Pattie Maes
Abstract: As AI chatbots see increased adoption and integration into everyday life, questions have been raised about the potential impact of human-like or anthropomorphic AI on users. In this work, we investigate the extent to which interactions with ChatGPT (with a focus on Advanced Voice Mode) may impact users' emotional well-being, behaviors and experiences through two parallel studies. To study the affective use of AI chatbots, we perform large-scale automated analysis of ChatGPT platform usage in a privacy-preserving manner, analyzing over 3 million conversations for affective cues and surveying over 4,000 users on their perceptions of ChatGPT. To investigate whether there is a relationship between model usage and emotional well-being, we conduct an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved randomized controlled trial (RCT) on close to 1,000 participants over 28 days, examining changes in their emotional well-being as they interact with ChatGPT under different experimental settings. In both on-platform data analysis and the RCT, we observe that very high usage correlates with increased self-reported indicators of dependence. From our RCT, we find that the impact of voice-based interactions on emotional well-being to be highly nuanced, and influenced by factors such as the user's initial emotional state and total usage duration. Overall, our analysis reveals that a small number of users are responsible for a disproportionate share of the most affective cues.
Abstract: 随着人工智能聊天机器人在日常生活中被越来越多地采用和整合,关于类人或拟人化人工智能对用户潜在影响的问题也随之浮现。 在这项工作中,我们通过两项平行研究,调查了与ChatGPT(重点是高级语音模式)互动可能如何影响用户的心理健康、行为和体验的程度。 为了研究AI聊天机器人的感性使用,我们以隐私保护的方式进行了大规模的自动化分析,分析了超过300万次对话中的情感线索,并对超过4000名用户就他们对ChatGPT的看法进行了调查。 为了研究模型使用与心理健康之间的关系,我们在近1000名参与者中进行了为期28天的机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的随机对照试验(RCT),探讨在不同实验设置下与ChatGPT互动时情绪健康的改变。 在平台内数据分析和RCT中,我们都观察到非常高频的使用与自我报告的依赖指标增加相关联。 从我们的RCT中发现,基于语音的互动对心理健康的影响非常复杂,并受到诸如用户初始情绪状态和总使用时间等因素的影响。 总体而言,我们的分析揭示,少数用户负责了大多数情感线索的产生。
Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) ; Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2504.03888 [cs.HC]
  (or arXiv:2504.03888v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.03888
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jason Phang [view email]
[v1] Fri, 4 Apr 2025 19:22:10 UTC (2,828 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.HC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号