Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2505.14388

Help | Advanced Search

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2505.14388 (cs)
[Submitted on 20 May 2025 ]

Title: Algorithmic Hiring and Diversity: Reducing Human-Algorithm Similarity for Better Outcomes

Title: 算法招聘与多样性:降低人机算法相似性以取得更好成果

Authors:Prasanna Parasurama, Panos Ipeirotis
Abstract: Algorithmic tools are increasingly used in hiring to improve fairness and diversity, often by enforcing constraints such as gender-balanced candidate shortlists. However, we show theoretically and empirically that enforcing equal representation at the shortlist stage does not necessarily translate into more diverse final hires, even when there is no gender bias in the hiring stage. We identify a crucial factor influencing this outcome: the correlation between the algorithm's screening criteria and the human hiring manager's evaluation criteria -- higher correlation leads to lower diversity in final hires. Using a large-scale empirical analysis of nearly 800,000 job applications across multiple technology firms, we find that enforcing equal shortlists yields limited improvements in hire diversity when the algorithmic screening closely mirrors the hiring manager's preferences. We propose a complementary algorithmic approach designed explicitly to diversify shortlists by selecting candidates likely to be overlooked by managers, yet still competitive according to their evaluation criteria. Empirical simulations show that this approach significantly enhances gender diversity in final hires without substantially compromising hire quality. These findings highlight the importance of algorithmic design choices in achieving organizational diversity goals and provide actionable guidance for practitioners implementing fairness-oriented hiring algorithms.
Abstract: 算法工具越来越多地被用于招聘中以提高公平性和多样性,通常通过实施性别平衡的候选人短名单等约束条件来实现。然而,我们从理论和实证上表明,在短名单阶段强制实现平等代表并不一定转化为最终雇佣中更高的多样性,即使在雇佣阶段不存在性别偏见的情况下也是如此。我们确定了一个影响这一结果的关键因素:算法筛选标准与人类招聘经理评估标准之间的相关性——相关性越高,最终雇佣的多样性越低。通过分析来自多家技术公司的近80万份工作申请的大规模实证数据,我们发现当算法筛选与招聘经理的偏好高度一致时,强制执行平等的短名单只能带来有限的雇佣多样性改善。我们提出了一种互补的算法方法,专门设计用来通过选择可能被管理者忽视但根据其评估标准仍然具有竞争力的候选人来多样化短名单。实证模拟显示,这种方法显著提高了最终雇佣中的性别多样性,而不会大幅降低雇佣质量。这些研究结果强调了在实现组织多样性目标时算法设计选择的重要性,并为实施公平导向招聘算法的从业者提供了可操作的指导。
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG) ; Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); General Economics (econ.GN)
Cite as: arXiv:2505.14388 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2505.14388v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.14388
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Prasanna Parasurama [view email]
[v1] Tue, 20 May 2025 14:09:43 UTC (765 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license
Current browse context:
econ.GN
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.HC
cs.LG
econ
q-fin
q-fin.EC

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号