Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2506.04974v1

Help | Advanced Search

Computer Science > Networking and Internet Architecture

arXiv:2506.04974v1 (cs)
[Submitted on 5 Jun 2025 ]

Title: Indoor Sharing in the Mid-Band: A Performance Study of Neutral-Host, Cellular Macro, and Wi-Fi

Title: 中频频段内的室内共享:中立主机、蜂窝宏基站和Wi-Fi的性能研究

Authors:Joshua Roy Palathinkal, Muhammad Iqbal Rochman, Vanlin Sathya, Mehmet Yavuz, Monisha Ghosh
Abstract: Indoor environments present a significant challenge for wireless connectivity, as immense data demand strains traditional solutions. Public Mobile Network Operators (MNOs), utilizing outdoor macro base stations (BSs), suffer from poor signal penetration. Indoor Wi-Fi networks, on the other hand, may face reliability issues due to spectrum contention. Shared spectrum models, particularly the Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) utilized by private 4G/5G networks, have emerged as a promising alternative to provide reliable indoor service. Moreover, these private networks are equipped with the neutral-host (NH) model, seamlessly offloading indoor MNOs' traffic to the private CBRS network. This paper presents a comprehensive, in-situ performance evaluation of three co-located technologies utilizing mid-bands spectrum (1-6 GHz)--a CBRS-based NH network, public MNO macro networks, and a Wi-Fi 6 network--within a large, big-box retail store characterized by significant building loss. Our analysis demonstrates: (i) the NH network provides superior indoor coverage compared to MNO macro, requiring only six CBRS devices (CBSDs)--versus 65 Access Points (APs) for enterprise Wi-Fi--to achieve full coverage, with a median building loss of 26.6 dB ensuring interference-free coexistence with outdoor federal incumbents; (ii) the NH network achieves substantial indoor throughput gains, with per-channel normalized throughput improvements of 1.44x and 1.62x in downlink (DL), and 4.33x and 13x in uplink (UL), compared to 4G and 5G macro deployments, respectively; (iii) the NH deployment achieves a median indoor aggregated physical (PHY)-layer DL throughput gain of 2.08x over 5G macro deployments indoors, despite utilizing only 40 MHz of aggregated bandwidth compared to 225 MHz for 5G macro; and (iv) the NH deployment also outperforms Wi-Fi in application-layer HTTP DL performance by 5.05x.
Abstract: 室内环境对无线连接提出了重大挑战,因为巨大的数据需求使传统解决方案面临压力。公共移动网络运营商(MNOs)利用室外宏基站(BSs),但信号穿透能力较差。另一方面,室内Wi-Fi网络可能由于频谱竞争而面临可靠性问题。共享频谱模式,尤其是由私人4G/5G网络使用的公民宽带无线电服务(CBRS),已成为提供可靠室内服务的有前景的替代方案。此外,这些私人网络配备了中立主机(NH)模型,可以无缝地将室内MNOs的流量卸载到私有的CBRS网络中。 本文对三种利用中频频段(1-6 GHz)的共址技术在一个具有显著建筑物损耗的大规模大卖场零售店进行了全面的现场性能评估——基于CBRS的NH网络、公共MNO宏网络和Wi-Fi 6网络。我们的分析表明:(i)NH网络提供的室内覆盖优于MNO宏网络,在实现完全覆盖时,只需要六个CBRS设备(CBSDs)——而企业级Wi-Fi需要65个接入点(APs),并且其中值建筑物损耗为26.6 dB,确保与室外联邦占优者无干扰共存;(ii)NH网络实现了显著的室内吞吐量增益,在下行(DL)中每通道归一化吞吐量提高了1.44倍和1.62倍,上行(UL)中提高了4.33倍和13倍,分别与4G和5G宏部署相比;(iii)尽管NH部署仅使用了40 MHz的聚合带宽(而5G宏部署为225 MHz),但在室内环境下,其相对于5G宏部署的中值室内聚合物理(PHY)层DL吞吐量增益达到了2.08倍;(iv)NH部署在应用层HTTP DL性能方面也比Wi-Fi高出5.05倍。
Comments: This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication
Subjects: Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI) ; Signal Processing (eess.SP)
Cite as: arXiv:2506.04974 [cs.NI]
  (or arXiv:2506.04974v1 [cs.NI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.04974
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Joshua Roy Palathinkal [view email]
[v1] Thu, 5 Jun 2025 12:47:05 UTC (1,716 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.NI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-06
Change to browse by:
cs
eess
eess.SP

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号