Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2509.17601v1

Help | Advanced Search

Physics > Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics

arXiv:2509.17601v1 (physics)
[Submitted on 22 Sep 2025 ]

Title: FastNet: Improving the physical consistency of machine-learning weather prediction models through loss function design

Title: FastNet:通过损失函数设计提高机器学习天气预测模型的物理一致性

Authors:Tom Dunstan, Oliver Strickson, Thusal Bennett, Jack Bowyer, Matthew Burnand, James Chappell, Alejandro Coca-Castro, Kirstine Ida Dale, Eric G. Daub, Noushin Eftekhari, Manvendra Janmaijaya, Jon Lillis, David Salvador-Jasin, Nathan Simpson, Ryan Sze-Yin Chan, Mohamad Elmasri, Lydia Allegranza France, Sam Madge, Levan Bokeria, Hannah Brown, Tom Dodds, Anna-Louise Ellis, David Llewellyn-Jones, Theo McCaie, Sophia Moreton, Tom Potter, James Robinson, Adam A. Scaife, Iain Stenson, David Walters, Karina Bett-Williams, Louisa van Zeeland, Peter Yatsyshin, J. Scott Hosking
Abstract: Machine learning weather prediction (MLWP) models have demonstrated remarkable potential in delivering accurate forecasts at significantly reduced computational cost compared to traditional numerical weather prediction (NWP) systems. However, challenges remain in ensuring the physical consistency of MLWP outputs, particularly in deterministic settings. This study presents FastNet, a graph neural network (GNN)-based global prediction model, and investigates the impact of alternative loss function designs on improving the physical realism of its forecasts. We explore three key modifications to the standard mean squared error (MSE) loss: (1) a modified spherical harmonic (MSH) loss that penalises spectral amplitude errors to reduce blurring and enhance small-scale structure retention; (2) inclusion of horizontal gradient terms in the loss to suppress non-physical artefacts; and (3) an alternative wind representation that decouples speed and direction to better capture extreme wind events. Results show that while the MSH and gradient-based losses \textit{alone} may slightly degrade RMSE scores, when trained in combination the model exhibits very similar MSE performance to an MSE-trained model while at the same time significantly improving spectral fidelity and physical consistency. The alternative wind representation further improves wind speed accuracy and reduces directional bias. Collectively, these findings highlight the importance of loss function design as a mechanism for embedding domain knowledge into MLWP models and advancing their operational readiness.
Abstract: 机器学习天气预测(MLWP)模型在与传统数值天气预测(NWP)系统相比,以显著降低的计算成本提供准确预报方面展示了惊人的潜力。 然而,在确保MLWP输出的物理一致性方面仍存在挑战,特别是在确定性设置中。 本研究介绍了FastNet,一个基于图神经网络(GNN)的全球预测模型,并研究了替代损失函数设计对提高其预报物理真实性的效果。 我们探索了标准均方误差(MSE)损失的三个关键修改:(1)一种修改后的球面谐波(MSH)损失,用于惩罚谱振幅误差,以减少模糊并增强小尺度结构保留;(2)在损失中包含水平梯度项,以抑制非物理伪影;(3)一种替代的风表示方法,将速度和方向解耦,以更好地捕捉极端风事件。 结果表明,尽管MSH和基于梯度的损失\textit{单独}可能会略微降低RMSE分数,但当联合训练时,该模型在MSE性能上与MSE训练模型非常相似,同时显著提高了谱保真度和物理一致性。 替代的风表示方法进一步提高了风速准确性并减少了方向偏差。 总体而言,这些发现强调了损失函数设计作为将领域知识嵌入MLWP模型并推进其业务准备度的机制的重要性。
Subjects: Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics (physics.ao-ph) ; Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2509.17601 [physics.ao-ph]
  (or arXiv:2509.17601v1 [physics.ao-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.17601
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Thomas Dunstan [view email]
[v1] Mon, 22 Sep 2025 11:21:29 UTC (6,439 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.ao-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号