Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > econ > arXiv:2510.02408

Help | Advanced Search

Economics > General Economics

arXiv:2510.02408 (econ)
[Submitted on 2 Oct 2025 ]

Title: Can GenAI Improve Academic Performance? Evidence from the Social and Behavioral Sciences

Title: 可以生成式人工智能提高学术表现吗? 来自社会科学和行为科学的证据

Authors:Dragan Filimonovic, Christian Rutzer, Conny Wunsch
Abstract: This paper estimates the effect of Generative AI (GenAI) adoption on scientific productivity and quality in the social and behavioral sciences. Using matched author-level panel data and a difference-in-differences design, we find that GenAI adoption is associated with sizable increases in research productivity, measured by the number of published papers. It also leads to moderate gains in publication quality, based on journal impact factors. These effects are most pronounced among early-career researchers, authors working in technically complex subfields, and those from non-English-speaking countries. The results suggest that GenAI tools may help lower some structural barriers in academic publishing and promote more inclusive participation in research.
Abstract: 本文评估了生成式人工智能(GenAI)采用对社会科学和行为科学领域科研产出和质量的影响。 使用匹配的作者层面面板数据和差异双重设计,我们发现GenAI的采用与研究产出的显著增加相关,产出量通过发表论文的数量来衡量。 此外,根据期刊影响因子,它还带来了适度的出版质量提升。 这些影响在早期职业研究人员、从事技术复杂子领域的作者以及非英语国家的作者中最为明显。 结果表明,GenAI工具可能有助于降低学术出版中的一些结构性障碍,并促进更包容的研究参与。
Subjects: General Economics (econ.GN)
Cite as: arXiv:2510.02408 [econ.GN]
  (or arXiv:2510.02408v1 [econ.GN] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.02408
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Christian Rutzer [view email]
[v1] Thu, 2 Oct 2025 07:32:47 UTC (57 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license
Current browse context:
q-fin.EC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-10
Change to browse by:
econ
econ.GN
q-fin

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号