Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > hep-ph > arXiv:2510.12216

Help | Advanced Search

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

arXiv:2510.12216 (hep-ph)
[Submitted on 14 Oct 2025 (v1) , last revised 28 Oct 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title: An improved perturbative QCD study of the decays $B_c^+ \to η_c L^+$

Title: 对衰变$B_c^+ \to η_c L^+$的改进微扰 QCD 研究

Authors:Wen-Jing Zhang, Xin Liu
Abstract: We perform an improved perturbative QCD study of the decays $B_c^+ \to \eta_c L^+$ ($L$ denotes the light ground state pseudoscalar, vector mesons and the corresponding $p$-wave scalar, axial-vector, and tensor ones) and predict their branching ratios (BRs) associated with relative ratios at leading order in the strong coupling $\alpha_s$. Our results ${\rm BR}(B_c^+ \to \eta_c \pi^+) =(2.03^{+0.53}_{-0.41}) \times 10^{-3}$ and ${\rm BR}(B_c^+ \to \eta_c \pi^+)/{\rm BR}(B_c^+ \to J/\psi \pi^+) = 1.74^{+0.66}_{-0.50}$ are consistent with several available predictions in different approaches within uncertainties. Inputting the measured $\eta_c \to p\bar p$ and $\eta_c \to \pi^+\pi^- (\pi^+\pi^-, K^+ K^-, p\bar p)$ BRs with $p$ here being a proton, we derive the multibody $B_c^+ \to \eta_c (\pi, \rho)^+$ BRs through secondary decay chains via resonance $\eta_c$ under the narrow-width approximation, which might facilitate the (near) future tests of $B_c \to \eta_c$ decays. Under the $q\bar q$ assignment for light scalars, different to $B_c$ decaying into $J/\psi$ plus a scalar meson and other $B_c^+ \to \eta_c L^+$ modes, surprisingly small $\Delta S =0$ BRs around ${\cal O}(10^{-7}-10^{-9})$ and highly large ratios near ${\cal O}(10^{2})$ between the $\Delta S=1$ and $\Delta S=0$ BRs are found in the $B_c$ decays to $\eta_c$ plus light scalars, with $S$ being strange number. Many large BRs and interesting ratios presented in this work could be tested by the Large Hadron Collider experiments, which would help us to examine the reliability of this improved perturbative QCD formalism for $B_c$-meson decays and further understand the QCD dynamics in the considered decay modes, as well as in the related hadrons.
Abstract: 我们对衰变$B_c^+ \to \eta_c L^+$($L$表示轻的基态伪标量、矢量介子和相应的$p$波标量、轴矢量和张量介子)进行了改进的微扰QCD研究,并预测了与强耦合常数$\alpha_s$的领先阶相对比值相关的分支比(BRs)。 我们的结果${\rm BR}(B_c^+ \to \eta_c \pi^+) =(2.03^{+0.53}_{-0.41}) \times 10^{-3}$和${\rm BR}(B_c^+ \to \eta_c \pi^+)/{\rm BR}(B_c^+ \to J/\psi \pi^+) = 1.74^{+0.66}_{-0.50}$在不确定度范围内与不同方法中的若干可用预测一致。 输入测量的$\eta_c \to p\bar p$和$\eta_c \to \pi^+\pi^- (\pi^+\pi^-, K^+ K^-, p\bar p)$BRs,其中$p$是质子,我们通过共振$\eta_c$的次级衰变链在窄宽度近似下推导出多体$B_c^+ \to \eta_c (\pi, \rho)^+$BRs,这可能有助于 (近) 未来对$B_c \to \eta_c$衰变的测试。 在光标量的$q\bar q$分配下,不同于$B_c$衰变为$J/\psi$加上一个标量介子和其他$B_c^+ \to \eta_c L^+$模式,发现在$B_c$衰变到$\eta_c$加上轻标量时,围绕${\cal O}(10^{-7}-10^{-9})$的非常小的$\Delta S =0$BR 值以及接近${\cal O}(10^{2})$的$\Delta S=1$和$\Delta S=0$BR 值之间的高比率,其中$S$是奇异数。 许多大的BRs和有趣的比率在本工作中提出,可以通过大型强子对撞机实验进行测试,这将有助于我们检验这种改进的微扰QCD形式主义在$B_c$-介子衰变中的可靠性,并进一步理解所考虑衰变模式中以及相关强子中的QCD动力学。
Comments: 14 pages, 1 figure, and 4 tables, submitted to journal
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph) ; High Energy Physics - Experiment (hep-ex)
Cite as: arXiv:2510.12216 [hep-ph]
  (or arXiv:2510.12216v2 [hep-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.12216
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: JSNU-PHY-HEP-OCT.25

Submission history

From: Xin Liu [view email]
[v1] Tue, 14 Oct 2025 07:13:23 UTC (119 KB)
[v2] Tue, 28 Oct 2025 03:13:51 UTC (117 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license
Current browse context:
hep-ex
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-10
Change to browse by:
hep-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号