Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2510.17726v1

Help | Advanced Search

Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction

arXiv:2510.17726v1 (cs)
[Submitted on 20 Oct 2025 ]

Title: Rethinking Search: A Study of University Students' Perspectives on Using LLMs and Traditional Search Engines in Academic Problem Solving

Title: 重新思考搜索:大学生在学术问题解决中使用大语言模型和传统搜索引擎的视角研究

Authors:Md. Faiyaz Abdullah Sayeedi, Md. Sadman Haque, Zobaer Ibn Razzaque, Robiul Awoul Robin, Sabila Nawshin
Abstract: With the increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in academic problem solving, university students frequently alternate between traditional search engines like Google and large language models (LLMs) for information retrieval. This study explores students' perceptions of both tools, emphasizing usability, efficiency, and their integration into academic workflows. Employing a mixed-methods approach, we surveyed 109 students from diverse disciplines and conducted in-depth interviews with 12 participants. Quantitative analyses, including ANOVA and chi-square tests, were used to assess differences in efficiency, satisfaction, and tool preference. Qualitative insights revealed that students commonly switch between GPT and Google: using Google for credible, multi-source information and GPT for summarization, explanation, and drafting. While neither tool proved sufficient on its own, there was a strong demand for a hybrid solution. In response, we developed a prototype, a chatbot embedded within the search interface, that combines GPT's conversational capabilities with Google's reliability to enhance academic research and reduce cognitive load.
Abstract: 随着人工智能(AI)在学术问题解决中的日益融合,大学生经常在传统的搜索引擎如谷歌和大型语言模型(LLMs)之间切换以进行信息检索。 本研究探讨了学生对这两种工具的看法,重点强调可用性、效率以及它们在学术工作流程中的整合。 采用混合方法,我们调查了来自不同学科的109名学生,并对12名参与者进行了深入访谈。 定量分析,包括方差分析和卡方检验,用于评估效率、满意度和工具偏好的差异。 定性见解显示,学生经常在GPT和谷歌之间切换:使用谷歌获取可信的多来源信息,而使用GPT进行总结、解释和起草。 尽管这两种工具单独使用都不足以满足需求,但对一种混合解决方案有强烈的需求。 作为回应,我们开发了一个原型,一个嵌入搜索界面中的聊天机器人,结合GPT的对话能力与谷歌的可靠性,以增强学术研究并减少认知负担。
Comments: Acctepted at the EMNLP 2025 HCI+NLP Workshop
Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
Cite as: arXiv:2510.17726 [cs.HC]
  (or arXiv:2510.17726v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.17726
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Md. Faiyaz Abdullah Sayeedi [view email]
[v1] Mon, 20 Oct 2025 16:42:49 UTC (381 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.HC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-10
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号