数字图书馆

• 替换

查看 最近的 文章

显示 2025年06月09日， 星期一 新的列表

替换提交 (展示 1 之 1 条目 )

[1] arXiv:2410.02701 (替换) [中文pdf, pdf, 其他]

标题： Web of Science文章分类调整对文献计量指标的影响 显示英文标题

标题： Impact of a reclassification of Web of Science articles on bibliometric indicators

Agénor Lahatte, Élisabeth de Turckheim

评论： 24页，25幅图

主题： 数字图书馆 (cs.DL)

本研究旨在评估OST实施的Web of Science文章重新分类方法。Web of Science的254个科学类别中的文章根据S. Milojević（2020）的方法被重新归类到242个修改后的类别和11个学科中。这种重新分类基于论文参考文献的类别，并不再将论文分配到多个类别或多学科类别中。它提高了WoS分类的准确性和模块化程度。由于最低级别文档分配发生了重要变化，常用的指标如学科概况或领域标准化指标也发生了显著变化。本研究探讨了其中的一些变化，以向OST报告的接收者提供解释。专业化指数的变化揭示了科学家对特定期刊的选择。在25个国家的样本中，巴西和中国提供了选择发表某些研究成果的期刊的设施或限制的例子。 显示英文摘要

This work aims at evaluating a reclassification of Web of Science articles implemented at OST. Articles from the 254 scientific categories of the Web of Science were reclassified at article level in 242 modified categories and 11 disciplines using the method of S. Milojevi\'c (2020). The reclassification is based on paper references categories and it no longer assigns papers to multiple or to multidisciplinary categories. It improves the accuracy and the modularity of the WoS classification. As there are important changes in document assignment at the lowest level, usual indicators such as disciplinary profiles or field normalized indicators are significantly modified. This study examines some of these modifications to provide explanations for the recipients of OST reports. Changes in specialization indexes reveal specific journal choices by scientists. In a sample of 25 countries, Brazil and China offer examples of facilities or constraints for selecting journals to publish certain research works.