标题： 对《动态维持的稳态压力梯度》的回复的评论 显示英文标题

标题： Comment on the Reply to Comment on 'Dynamically maintained steady-state pressure gradients'

摘要： 针对对动态维持稳态压差的评论，希恩对他提出的对邓肯悖论的十五个解决方案的回应进行了回复。 这一对希恩回应的评论旨在指出，是超催化作用导致了邓肯悖论以及热力学第二定律的违反。 在固体实验结果明确支持超催化作用之前，热力学第二定律仍然有效，邓肯悖论并不是一个悖论。 显示英文摘要

摘要： In Reply to Comment on Dynamically maintained steady-state pressure gradients, Sheehan offered his responses to the fifteen proposed resolutions to Duncan's paradox. This comment on Sheehan's reply aims to point out that it is epicatalysis that results in Duncan's paradox and the violation of the second law of thermodynamics. Until solid experimental findings unequivocally support epicatalysis, the second law of thermodynamics remains valid and Duncan's paradox is not a paradox.