标题： 限制非标准宇宙学模型结合高红移类星体和BAO的观测 显示英文标题

标题： Constraining on the non-standard cosmological models combining the observations of high-redshift quasars and BAO

摘要： 在这项工作中，我们研究了四种不同机制驱动宇宙加速膨胀的宇宙学模型，包括 膜世界模型、Chaplygin 气体模型、涌现暗能量模型和宇宙学扭转模型。 考虑到这些模型在低红移处的动力学非常相似且难以区分，我们使用了覆盖红移范围为$0.009<z<7.5$的最新和最大规模的类星体（QSO）紫外和X射线观测数据。 然而，由于该样本的高固有离散性和宇宙学模型参数之间的退化现象，我们添加了二维BAO和三维BAO数据集以帮助我们限制这些宇宙学模型的参数。 我们的结果显示，标准冷暗物质情景可能并不是高红移观测所偏好的最佳宇宙学模型。 广义 Chaplygin 气体（GCG）和宇宙常数加扭转（称为情况 II）模型在赤池信息准则（AIC）下表现最佳，但$\Lambda$CDM 是贝叶斯信息准则（BIC）所偏好的最佳宇宙学模型。 我们的工作还支持，现象学涌现暗能量和宇宙学扭转模型可能缓解哈勃张力，从 QSO+BAO 数据组合获得的哈勃常数报告值介于 Planck 2018 观测和 SH0ES 合作组织的本地测量之间，而其他宇宙学模型都支持哈勃常数更接近近期 Planck 2018 结果，但这些模型受到信息准则的惩罚。 显示英文摘要

摘要： In this work, we studied four types of cosmological models with different mechanisms driving the accelerated expansion of the universe, include Braneworld models, Chaplygin Gas models, Emergent Dark Energy models, and cosmological torsion models. Considering that the dynamics of these models at low redshifts are very similar and difficult to distinguish, we used the latest and largest UV and X-ray measurements of quasars (QSOs) observations covering the range of redshift $0.009<z<7.5$. However, the high intrinsic dispersion of this sample and the degeneracy between cosmological model parameters, we added 2D-BAO and 3D-BAO datasets to help us constrain the parameters of these cosmological models. Our results suggest that standard cold dark matter scenario may not be the best cosmological model preferred by the high-redshift observations. The Generalized Chaplygin Gas (GCG) and cosmological constant plus torsion (named Case II) models perform best by Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), but the $\Lambda$CDM is the best cosmological model preferred by Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Our work also supports that the Phenomenologically Emergent Dark Energy and cosmological torsion models may alleviate the Hubble tension, the reported value of the Hubble constant obtained from QSO+BAO datasets combination lies between Planck 2018 observations and local measurements from the SH0ES collaboration, while other cosmological models all support that the Hubble constant tends to be closer to recent Planck 2018 results, but these model are penalized by information criterion.