标题： 人工智能与法律 显示英文标题

标题： AI and the law

摘要： 我认为生成式人工智能将对法律的演进产生不均衡的影响。 为此，我将生成式人工智能视为一种增强劳动力的技术，它降低了撰写更完整的合同和在法院诉讼的成本。 合同效应通过使合同更加完整，减少了对法院服务的需求。 相比之下，诉讼效应通过a)使合同变得不那么完整以及b)在其他条件相同的情况下降低当事人和解的动机，从而增加了对法院服务的需求。 在合同常见的领域，如财产法和合同法，由于合同效应和诉讼效应相互抵消，诉讼数量的变化是不确定的。 然而，在合同较少的领域，如侵权法，诉讼量可能会增加。 遵循Rubin（1977）和Priest（1977）的观点，生成式人工智能将加速侵权法向效率方向的演变。 显示英文摘要

摘要： I argue that generative AI will have an uneven effect on the evolution of the law. To do so, I consider generative AI as a labor-augmenting technology that reduces the cost of both writing more complete contracts and litigating in court. The contracting effect reduces the demand for court services by making contracts more complete. The litigation effect, by contrast, increases the demand for court services by a) making contracts less complete and b) reducing litigants' incentive to settle, all else equal. Where contracts are common, as in property and contract law, the change in the quantity of litigation is uncertain due to offsetting contracting and litigation effects. However, in areas where contracts are rare, as in tort law, the amount of litigation is likely to rise. Following Rubin (1977) and Priest (1977) generative AI will accelerate the evolution of tort law toward efficiency.