标题： 对“慢反质子在LiF中的电子阻止异常”的评论，arXiv:2501.14381 显示英文标题

标题： Comment on 'Anomalies in the Electronic Stopping of Slow Antiprotons in LiF', arXiv:2501.14381

摘要： 本文包含了对Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 076401 (2025)内容的详细讨论，以下简记为PRL134。本文评论中重新审视并详细阐述了反粒子在物质中能量损失的绝热电离模型（AIM），特别是对其先前建立的理论基础进行了特别参考。AIM框架在PRL134作者所考虑的低速范围内的离子动力学描述中起着核心作用。计算得到的AIM结果用于比较反质子在LiF晶体中的能量损失与实验数据和其他不同模型的数据，指出了PRL134结果存在的严重问题。除了这一特定的理论对比研究之外，我们还批判性地检查了PRL134中的若干陈述和假设。其中某些说法似乎与已确立的理论原则不一致，或者由提供的数据和论据不足以证明。因此，我们认为有必要进一步澄清，以及在某些情况下提供更为严格的论证来支持这些观点。 显示英文摘要

摘要： This work contains detailed discussions on the contents of Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 076401 (2025), in the following denoted PRL134. In this comment, we revisit and elaborate on the Adiabatic Ionization Model (AIM) for the energy loss of antiparticles in matter, with particular reference to its theoretical foundation as established previously. The AIM framework plays a central role in describing the ionization dynamics in the low-velocity regime considered by the authors of PRL134. Calculated AIM results for the energy loss of antiprotons in LiF crystals are compared to experimental data and different other models, pointing to severe problems of the PRL134 results. Beyond this specific comparative theoretical investigation, we critically examine several statements and assumptions made in PRL134. Certain claims presented therein appear to be inconsistent with established theoretical principles or are insufficiently justified by the data and arguments provided. As such, we believe that further clarification, and in some cases, a more rigorous justification, is necessary to substantiate those points.