标题： 基于联盟参考文献和出版物权重的论文自动审稿人分配 显示英文标题

标题： Automatic Reviewers Assignment to a Research Paper Based on Allied References and Publications Weight

摘要： 每天，大量研究文献被提交到会议、文集、期刊、简报、年度报告、日报和各种定期出版物。 许多此类出版物使用独立的外部专家来评审投稿。 这个过程称为同行评审，评审人称为审稿人。 然而，不一定总能选出最佳的审稿人进行评审。 此外，每个领域都在不断出现新的研究领域，研究论文的数量也在急剧增加。 为了评审所有这些论文，每本期刊都会指派一个小的审稿人团队，他们可能并非所有领域都精通。 例如，一篇通信技术的研究论文应由同一领域的专家进行评审。 因此，为研究论文高效地选择最佳审稿人是一个重大挑战。 在本研究中，我们提出并实现了一个程序，该程序使用一种新策略来自动选择研究论文的最佳审稿人。 每篇研究论文末尾都有参考文献，通常来自同一领域。 首先，我们收集参考文献，并统计至少有一篇论文出现在参考文献中的作者。 然后，我们自动浏览网络以提取研究主题关键词。 接下来，我们搜索特定主题中的顶级研究人员，并统计前n位作者的h指数、i10指数和引用次数。 之后，我们根据分数对前n位作者进行排名，并自动浏览他们的个人主页以获取电子邮件地址。 我们还会检查他们的合著者和同事，并将他们从列表中剔除。 剩下的前n位作者，通常是教授，很可能是评审该研究论文的最佳审稿人。 显示英文摘要

摘要： Everyday, a vast stream of research documents is submitted to conferences, anthologies, journals, newsletters, annual reports, daily papers, and various periodicals. Many such publications use independent external specialists to review submissions. This process is called peer review, and the reviewers are called referees. However, it is not always possible to pick the best referee for reviewing. Moreover, new research fields are emerging in every sector, and the number of research papers is increasing dramatically. To review all these papers, every journal assigns a small team of referees who may not be experts in all areas. For example, a research paper in communication technology should be reviewed by an expert from the same field. Thus, efficiently selecting the best reviewer or referee for a research paper is a big challenge. In this research, we propose and implement program that uses a new strategy to automatically select the best reviewers for a research paper. Every research paper contains references at the end, usually from the same area. First, we collect the references and count authors who have at least one paper in the references. Then, we automatically browse the web to extract research topic keywords. Next, we search for top researchers in the specific topic and count their h-index, i10-index, and citations for the first n authors. Afterward, we rank the top n authors based on a score and automatically browse their homepages to retrieve email addresses. We also check their co-authors and colleagues online and discard them from the list. The remaining top n authors, generally professors, are likely the best referees for reviewing the research paper.