标题： 当我们讨论玻恩-奥本海默近似时，我们在谈论什么？ 显示英文标题

标题： What are we talking about when we discuss the Born-Oppenheimer approximation?

摘要： 尼克·哈格特、詹姆斯·拉德曼和卡里姆·特巴尔（HLT）发表了一篇全面的文章，探讨了玻恩-奥本海默近似（BOA）。 他们的主要目标是挑战我们对此问题的立场——即玻恩-奥本海默近似包含了一个与海森堡不确定性原理不相容的经典假设。 相反，HLT认为玻恩-奥本海默近似并不涉及这样的经典假设，因此支持化学可以还原为物理学的观点。 本文的目的是对HLT的文章进行批判性分析，并阐明我们认为他们的论点缺乏说服力的原因。 显示英文摘要

摘要： Nick Huggett, James Ladyman, and Karim Thebault (HLT) have presented a comprehensive article examining the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation (BOA). Their central objective is to challenge our position on the matter-namely, that the BOA incorporates a classical assumption incompatible with the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. In contrast, HLT contend that the BOA involves no such classical assumption and, as a result, supports the view that chemistry can be reduced to physics. The purpose of this paper is to offer a critical analysis of the HLT article and to clarify why we consider their arguments unpersuasive.