标题： 立场论文：如果人工智能系统的创新系统性地违反基本权利，这还是创新吗？ 显示英文标题

标题： Position Paper: If Innovation in AI Systematically Violates Fundamental Rights, Is It Innovation at All?

摘要： 人工智能（AI）如今渗透到关键基础设施和决策系统中，这些系统中的故障会造成社会、经济和民主方面的损害。 本文立场文件挑战了监管与创新是对立的固有观念。 正如航空、制药和福利系统中的类比以及最近的合成虚假信息、偏见和不可问责的决策案例所证明的那样，设计良好的监管的缺失已经造成了无法估量的损害。 当监管是深思熟虑且适应性强时，它不是对创新的阻碍——而是其基础。 本文立场文件以欧盟人工智能法案为风险导向、责任驱动监管的典范，解决了Collingridge困境：在足够早的时候采取行动以防止损害，同时具备足够的灵活性以维持创新。 其适应性机制——监管沙盒、中小企业（SMEs）支持、现实世界测试、基本权利影响评估（FRIA）——展示了监管如何加速负责任的技术进步，而不是延迟技术进步。 该立场文件总结了治理工具如何将感知到的负担转化为具体的优点：法律确定性、消费者信任和伦理竞争力。 最终，本文重新定义了进步：创新和监管共同推进。 通过将透明度、影响评估、问责制和人工智能素养嵌入设计和部署中，欧盟框架定义了负责任创新的真正含义——由民主价值观和基本权利规范的技术雄心。 显示英文摘要

摘要： Artificial intelligence (AI) now permeates critical infrastructures and decision-making systems where failures produce social, economic, and democratic harm. This position paper challenges the entrenched belief that regulation and innovation are opposites. As evidenced by analogies from aviation, pharmaceuticals, and welfare systems and recent cases of synthetic misinformation, bias and unaccountable decision-making, the absence of well-designed regulation has already created immeasurable damage. Regulation, when thoughtful and adaptive, is not a brake on innovation--it is its foundation. The present position paper examines the EU AI Act as a model of risk-based, responsibility-driven regulation that addresses the Collingridge Dilemma: acting early enough to prevent harm, yet flexibly enough to sustain innovation. Its adaptive mechanisms--regulatory sandboxes, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) support, real-world testing, fundamental rights impact assessment (FRIA) -- demonstrate how regulation can accelerate responsibly, rather than delay, technological progress. The position paper summarises how governance tools transform perceived burdens into tangible advantages: legal certainty, consumer trust, and ethical competitiveness. Ultimately, the paper reframes progress: innovation and regulation advance together. By embedding transparency, impact assessments, accountability, and AI literacy into design and deployment, the EU framework defines what responsible innovation truly means--technological ambition disciplined by democratic values and fundamental rights.