标题： 我们对N16的β衰变和氦燃烧中氧形成了解多少？ 显示英文标题

标题： How Well Do We Know the Beta-Decay of N16 and Oxygen Formation in Helium Burning?

摘要： 与声称该问题已得到解决的说法相反，12ag 的天体物理 E1 S 因子\c 并未被充分了解。 弹性散射数据的 R-矩阵分析、\c 12ag 数据以及 N16 的 β 延迟 α 粒子发射数据并不一致，不能排除小 S 因子解 SE1(300) 的可能性。 特别是，N16 的 β 延迟 α 粒子发射数据不一致。 未经修改的美因茨数据与 TRIUMF 不一致，但与西雅图和耶鲁 - 康涅狄格大学的数据一致。 TRIUMF 合作组已重新校准了美因茨('71)数据；然而，我们质疑 TRIUMF 合作组对美因茨数据的修改以及重新校准的理由。 显示英文摘要

摘要： Contrary to claims that the problem has been solved, the astrophysical E1 S-factor of \c12ag is not yet well known. R-Matrix analyses of elastic scattering data,\c12ag data, and data on the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission of N16 are not consistent and a small S-factor solution SE1(300) cannot be ruled out. In particular, data on the beta- delayed alpha-particle emission of N16 do not agree. The unaltered Mainz data do not agree with TRIUMF, but agree with both Seattle and Yale-UConn. The TRIUMF col- laboration has recalibratedthe Mainz('71) data; however, we dispute both the alteration of the Mainz data performed by the TRIUMF col- laboration and the very justification for the recalibration.