Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1403.0941

Help | Advanced Search

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1403.0941 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 4 Mar 2014 (v1) , last revised 9 Jul 2014 (this version, v2)]

Title: On the use of semi-numerical simulations in predicting the 21-cm signal from the epoch of reionization

Title: 关于使用半数值模拟预测再电离时代的21厘米信号

Authors:Suman Majumdar (Stockholm U), Garrelt Mellema (Stockholm U), Kanan K. Datta (NCRA-TIFR), Hannes Jensen (Stockholm U), T. Roy Choudhury (NCRA-TIFR), Somnath Bharadwaj (IIT Kharagpur), Martina M. Friedrich (CCA UNAM)
Abstract: We present a detailed comparison of three different simulations of the epoch of reionization (EoR). The radiative transfer simulation (${\rm C}^2$-RAY) among them is our benchmark. Radiative transfer codes can produce realistic results, but are computationally expensive. We compare it with two semi-numerical techniques: one using the same halos as ${\rm C}^2$-RAY as its sources (Sem-Num), and one using a conditional Press-Schechter scheme (CPS+GS). These are vastly more computationally efficient than ${\rm C}^2$-RAY, but use more simplistic physical assumptions. We evaluate these simulations in terms of their ability to reproduce the history and morphology of reionization. We find that both Sem-Num and CPS+GS can produce an ionization history and morphology that is very close to ${\rm C}^2$-RAY, with Sem-Num performing slightly better compared to CPS+GS. We also study different redshift space observables of the 21-cm signal from EoR: the variance, power spectrum and its various angular multipole moments. We find that both semi-numerical models perform reasonably well in predicting these observables at length scales relevant for present and future experiments. However, Sem-Num performs slightly better than CPS+GS in producing the reionization history, which is necessary for interpreting the future observations.
Abstract: 我们详细比较了三个不同再电离(EoR)时期的模拟。其中辐射传输模拟(${\rm C}^2$-RAY)是我们的基准。辐射传输代码可以产生现实的结果,但计算成本高昂。我们将它与两种半数值技术进行比较:一种使用与${\rm C}^2$-RAY相同的暗晕作为源(Sem-Num),另一种使用条件Press-Schechter方案(CPS+GS)。这些方法比${\rm C}^2$-RAY在计算上高效得多,但采用更简单的物理假设。我们根据它们再现再电离历史和形态的能力来评估这些模拟。我们发现Sem-Num和CPS+GS都能产生非常接近${\rm C}^2$-RAY的电离历史和形态,且Sem-Num的表现略优于CPS+GS。我们还研究了来自EoR的21厘米信号的不同红移空间可观测量:方差、功率谱及其各种角多极矩。我们发现这两种半数值模型在预测当前和未来实验相关尺度上的这些可观测量时表现合理。然而,在产生再电离历史方面,Sem-Num略优于CPS+GS,这对于解释未来的观测至关重要。
Comments: 20 pages, 14 figures, 1 table. Accepted for publication in MNRAS. Replaced to match the accepted version
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1403.0941 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1403.0941v2 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1403.0941
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2014 443 (2): 2843-2861
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1342
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Suman Majumdar [view email]
[v1] Tue, 4 Mar 2014 21:00:26 UTC (4,512 KB)
[v2] Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:33:07 UTC (4,270 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2014-03
Change to browse by:
astro-ph.CO

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号