Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1403.0941v1

Help | Advanced Search

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1403.0941v1 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 4 Mar 2014 (this version) , latest version 9 Jul 2014 (v2) ]

Title: On the use of semi-numerical simulations in predicting the 21-cm signal from the epoch of reionization

Title: 在利用半数值模拟预测再电离时期21厘米信号中的应用

Authors:Suman Majumdar (Stockholm U), Garrelt Mellema (Stockholm U), Kanan K. Datta (NCRA-TIFR), Hannes Jensen (Stockholm U), T. Roy Choudhury (NCRA-TIFR), Somnath Bharadwaj (IIT Kharagpur), Martina M. Friedrich (CCA UNAM)
Abstract: We perform a detailed comparison of three different simulations of the neutral hydrogen distribution during the epoch of reionization (EoR). Our benchmark is a radiative transfer simulation (C2RAY). Such simulations can produce realistic results, but are computationally expensive. We compare it with two different semi-numerical techniques: one using the same halos as C2RAY as its sources (Sem-Num), and one using a conditional Press-Schechter scheme (CPS+GS). These are more computationally efficient than C2RAY, but use more simplistic physics. We evaluate them in terms of how well they can reproduce the history and morphology of EoR. We find that Sem-Num can produce an ionization history and morphology that is very close to C2RAY. Considering the effects of redshift space distortions due to peculiar velocities, we also study a number of statistics such as: the variance, spherically averaged power spectrum and various angular multipole moments of the power spectrum of the 21-cm signal from EoR,that will be observable by upcoming radio telescopes. We find that both semi-numerical models perform quite well in predicting these observables at length scales relevant for the present and future experiments. We also observe that predictions from Sem-Num are slightly better (by $\sim 10\%$) than CPS+GS for most of the observables. However, the predictions for the reionization history and the morphology of the ionization maps are significantly better (by $\sim 25-50\%$) in Sem-Num than CPS+GS. As the predictions for the 21-cm signal together with the reionization history would be required for parametrization of EoR from the observations, it would be better to use a semi-numerical simulation which can predict both with an acceptable accuracy. Our analysis shows that among the two semi-numerical simulations Sem-Num satisfies this criteria very well as it uses a source model very similar to C2RAY.
Abstract: 我们对再电离时期(EoR)中中性氢分布的三种不同模拟进行了详细比较。 我们的基准是辐射转移模拟(C2RAY)。 这些模拟可以产生现实的结果,但计算成本很高。 我们将它与两种不同的半数值技术进行比较:一种使用与C2RAY相同的晕作为其源(Sem-Num),另一种使用条件Press-Schechter方案(CPS+GS)。 这些方法比C2RAY计算效率更高,但使用的物理模型更简单。 我们评估它们在多大程度上能够再现EoR的历史和形态。 我们发现,Sem-Num可以产生与C2RAY非常接近的电离历史和形态。 考虑到由于特殊速度引起的红移空间畸变的影响,我们还研究了一些统计量,例如:21厘米信号的方差、球对称平均功率谱以及功率谱的各种角度多重极矩,这些将是未来射电望远镜可观察到的。 我们发现,这两种半数值模型在预测当前和未来实验相关尺度上的这些可观测值方面表现相当不错。 我们还观察到,对于大多数可观测值,Sem-Num的预测略优于CPS+GS(由$\sim 10\%$表示)。 然而,对于再电离历史和电离图的形态,Sem-Num的预测显著优于CPS+GS(由$\sim 25-50\%$表示)。 由于从观测中对EoR进行参数化需要21厘米信号和再电离历史的预测,因此最好使用一种可以以可接受精度预测两者的半数值模拟。 我们的分析表明,在两种半数值模拟中,Sem-Num很好地满足了这一标准,因为它使用的源模型与C2RAY非常相似。
Comments: 18 pages, 13 figures, 1 table. Submitted to MNRAS
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1403.0941 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1403.0941v1 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1403.0941
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Suman Majumdar [view email]
[v1] Tue, 4 Mar 2014 21:00:26 UTC (4,512 KB)
[v2] Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:33:07 UTC (4,270 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2014-03
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号