Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1608.01838

Help | Advanced Search

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1608.01838 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 5 Aug 2016 ]

Title: Inference from the small scales of cosmic shear with current and future Dark Energy Survey data

Title: 从当前和未来暗能量调查数据的宇宙剪切小尺度推断

Authors:N. MacCrann, J. Aleksić, A. Amara, S. L. Bridle, C. Bruderer, C. Chang, S. Dodelson, T. F. Eifler, E. M. Huff, D. Huterer, T. Kacprzak, A. Refregier, E. Suchyta, R. H. Wechsler, J. Zuntz, T. M. C. Abbott, S. Allam, J. Annis, R. Armstrong, A. Benoit-Lévy, D. Brooks, D. L. Burke, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander, M. Crocce, C. E. Cunha, L. N. da Costa, S. Desai, H. T. Diehl, J. P. Dietrich, P. Doel, A. E. Evrard, B. Flaugher, P. Fosalba, D. W. Gerdes, D. A. Goldstein, D. Gruen, R. A. Gruendl, G. Gutierrez, K. Honscheid, D. J. James, M. Jarvis, E. Krause, K. Kuehn, N. Kuropatkin, M. Lima, J. L. Marshall, P. Melchior, F. Menanteau, R. Miquel, A. A. Plazas, A. K. Romer, E. S. Rykoff, E. Sanchez, V. Scarpine, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, E. Sheldon, M. Soares-Santos, M. E. C. Swanson, G. Tarle, D. Thomas, V. Vikram
Abstract: Cosmic shear is sensitive to fluctuations in the cosmological matter density field, including on small physical scales, where matter clustering is affected by baryonic physics in galaxies and galaxy clusters, such as star formation, supernovae feedback and AGN feedback. While muddying any cosmological information that is contained in small scale cosmic shear measurements, this does mean that cosmic shear has the potential to constrain baryonic physics and galaxy formation. We perform an analysis of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification (SV) cosmic shear measurements, now extended to smaller scales, and using the Mead et al. 2015 halo model to account for baryonic feedback. While the SV data has limited statistical power, we demonstrate using a simulated likelihood analysis that the final DES data will have the statistical power to differentiate among baryonic feedback scenarios. We also explore some of the difficulties in interpreting the small scales in cosmic shear measurements, presenting estimates of the size of several other systematic effects that make inference from small scales difficult, including uncertainty in the modelling of intrinsic alignment on nonlinear scales, `lensing bias', and shape measurement selection effects. For the latter two, we make use of novel image simulations. While future cosmic shear datasets have the statistical power to constrain baryonic feedback scenarios, there are several systematic effects that require improved treatments, in order to make robust conclusions about baryonic feedback.
Abstract: 宇宙剪切对宇宙物质密度场的波动敏感,包括在小物理尺度上,其中物质聚集受到星系和星系团中的重子物理影响,如恒星形成、超新星反馈和活动星系核反馈。 虽然这会模糊小尺度宇宙剪切测量中包含的宇宙学信息,但这意味着宇宙剪切有可能约束重子物理和星系形成。 我们对暗能量调查(DES)科学验证(SV)的宇宙剪切测量进行了分析,现在已扩展到更小的尺度,并使用Mead等人2015年的晕模型来考虑重子反馈。 尽管SV数据统计能力有限,但我们通过模拟似然分析证明,最终的DES数据将具有区分重子反馈情景的统计能力。 我们还探讨了在宇宙剪切测量中解释小尺度的一些困难,提出了几种其他系统效应的估计,这些效应使从小尺度进行推断变得困难,包括非线性尺度上固有对齐建模的不确定性、"透镜偏差"和形状测量选择效应。 对于后两种效应,我们利用了新颖的图像模拟。 虽然未来的宇宙剪切数据集具有约束重子反馈情景的统计能力,但有几个系统效应需要改进处理,以便对重子反馈得出稳健的结论。
Comments: 14 pages, 10 figures
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1608.01838 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1608.01838v1 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1608.01838
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2849
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Niall MacCrann [view email]
[v1] Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:31:55 UTC (4,669 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-08
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号