Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1608.08057

Help | Advanced Search

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1608.08057 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 29 Aug 2016 ]

Title: Cosmic Degeneracies II: Structure formation in joint simulations of Warm Dark Matter and $f(R)$ gravity

Title: 宇宙退化II:温暗物质和$f(R)$引力的联合模拟中的结构形成

Authors:Marco Baldi, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro
Abstract: We present for the first time the outcomes of a cosmological N-body simulation that simultaneously implements a Warm Dark Matter (WDM) particle candidate and a modified gravitational interaction in the form of $f(R)$ gravity, and compare its results with the individual effects of these two independent extensions of the standard $\Lambda $CDM scenario, and with the reference cosmology itself. We consider a rather extreme value of the WDM particle mass ($m_{\rm WDM}=0.4$ keV) and a single realisation of $f(R)$ gravity with $|\bar{f}_{R0}|=10^{-5}$, and we investigate the impact of these models and of their combination on a wide range of cosmological observables with the aim to identify possible observational degeneracies. In particular, we focus on the large-scale matter distribution, as well as on the statistical and structural properties of collapsed halos and cosmic voids. Differently from the case of combining $f(R)$ gravity with massive neutrinos -- previously investigated in Baldi et al. (2014) -- we find that most of the considered observables do not show any significant degeneracy due to the fact that WDM and $f(R)$ gravity are characterised by individual observational footprints with a very different functional dependence on cosmic scales and halo masses. In particular, this is the case for the nonlinear matter power spectrum in real space, for the halo and sub-halo mass functions, for the halo density profiles and for the concentration-mass relation. However, other observables -- like e.g. the halo bias -- do show some level of degeneracy between the two models, while a very strong degeneracy is observed for the nonlinear matter power spectrum in redshift space, for the density profiles of small cosmic voids -- with radius below $\approx 5$ Mpc$/h$ -- and for the voids abundance as a function of the void core density.
Abstract: 我们首次展示了宇宙学N体模拟的结果,该模拟同时实现了温暗物质(WDM)粒子候选者和一种形式为$f(R)$引力的修改引力相互作用,并将其结果与这两个独立于标准$\Lambda $冷暗物质(CDM)情景的扩展单独效果以及参考宇宙学本身进行比较。 我们考虑了一个相当极端的WDM粒子质量值($m_{\rm WDM}=0.4$keV)以及一个$f(R)$引力的单一实现,其中$|\bar{f}_{R0}|=10^{-5}$,并研究这些模型及其组合对广泛范围的宇宙学可观测量的影响,目的是识别可能的观测退化。 特别是,我们关注大尺度物质分布,以及坍缩晕和宇宙空洞的统计和结构特性。 与结合$f(R)$引力与重中微子的情况不同——此前在Baldi等人(2014)的研究中已经调查过——我们发现,由于WDM和$f(R)$引力具有不同的观测足迹,它们在宇宙尺度和晕质量上的功能依赖性非常不同,因此大多数考虑的可观测量没有显示出显著的退化。 特别是,这适用于实空间中的非线性物质功率谱、晕和子晕质量函数、晕密度剖面以及浓度-质量关系。 然而,其他可观测量——例如,比如 晕bias——在两个模型之间显示出一定程度的退化,而在红移空间中非线性物质功率谱则表现出非常强的退化,对于半径低于$\approx 5$ Mpc$/h$的小宇宙空洞的密度剖面,以及作为空洞核心密度函数的空洞丰度。
Comments: 14 pages, 9 figures, 1 table. Submitted to MNRAS
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1608.08057 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1608.08057v1 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1608.08057
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Marco Baldi [view email]
[v1] Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:08:56 UTC (228 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-08
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号