Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > stat > arXiv:1911.00098

Help | Advanced Search

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:1911.00098 (stat)
[Submitted on 31 Oct 2019 (v1) , last revised 18 Jun 2025 (this version, v5)]

Title: Simultaneous Inference for Multiple Proportions: A Multivariate Beta-Binomial Model

Title: 多个比例的同时推断:多元Beta-二项式模型

Authors:Max Westphal
Abstract: Statistical inference in high-dimensional settings is challenging when standard unregularized methods are employed. In this work, we focus on the case of multiple correlated proportions for which we develop a Bayesian inference framework. For this purpose, we construct an $m$-dimensional Beta distribution from a $2^m$-dimensional Dirichlet distribution, building on work by Olkin and Trikalinos (2015). This readily leads to a multivariate Beta-binomial model for which simple update rules from the common Dirichlet-multinomial model can be adopted. From the frequentist perspective, this approach amounts to adding pseudo-observations to the data and allows a joint shrinkage estimation of mean vector and covariance matrix. For higher dimensions ($m > 10$), the extensive model based on $2^m$ parameters starts to become numerically infeasible. To counter this problem, we utilize a reduced parametrisation which has only $1 + m(m + 1)/2$ parameters describing first and second order moments. A copula model can then be used to approximate the (posterior) multivariate Beta distribution. A natural inference goal is the construction of multivariate credible regions. The properties of different credible regions are assessed in a simulation study in the context of investigating the accuracy of multiple binary classifiers. It is shown that the extensive and copula approach lead to a (Bayes) coverage probability very close to the target level. In this regard, they outperform credible regions based on a normal approximation of the posterior distribution, in particular for small sample sizes. Additionally, they always lead to credible regions which lie entirely in the parameter space which is not the case when the normal approximation is used.
Abstract: 在使用标准未正则化方法时,高维设置下的统计推断具有挑战性。 在这项工作中,我们专注于多个相关比例的情况,并为此开发了一个贝叶斯推断框架。 为此,我们基于 Olkin 和 Trikalinos (2015) 的工作,从一个$2^m$维的狄利克雷分布构建了一个$m$维的 Beta 分布。 这自然引出了一个多元 Beta-二项式模型,可以采用常见的狄利克雷-多项式模型的简单更新规则。 从频率学派的角度来看,这种方法相当于向数据添加伪观测值,并允许联合收缩估计均值向量和协方差矩阵。 对于更高的维度($m > 10$),基于$2^m$参数的广泛模型开始变得数值上不可行。 为了解决这个问题,我们利用了一种减少参数化的形式,该形式仅描述了前两阶矩,共有$1 + m(m + 1)/2$个参数。 然后可以使用 Copula 模型来近似后验多元 Beta 分布。 一个自然的推断目标是构造多变量可信区域。 在调查多个二元分类器准确性的情境下,通过模拟研究评估了不同可信区域的属性。 结果显示,广泛的和 Copula 方法得到的(贝叶斯)覆盖概率非常接近目标水平。 在这方面,它们优于基于后验分布正态近似的可信区域,特别是在样本量较小时。 此外,它们始终生成完全位于参数空间内的可信区域,而当使用正态近似时则不然。
Comments: 25 pages, 7 figures; v2: one reference updated, minor cosmetic changes, contents unaffected; v3: slight abstract overhaul, typos fixed, different template, contents unaffected; v4: added comment regarding limitation of copula approach in discussion section, no other changes; v5: fixed denominator in last equation of proposition 2.1
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
MSC classes: 62F15 (Primary) 62H99 (Secondary)
Cite as: arXiv:1911.00098 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1911.00098v5 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1911.00098
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Max Westphal [view email]
[v1] Thu, 31 Oct 2019 20:47:56 UTC (1,894 KB)
[v2] Fri, 8 Nov 2019 02:49:27 UTC (1,863 KB)
[v3] Tue, 10 Mar 2020 22:32:12 UTC (1,834 KB)
[v4] Fri, 20 Mar 2020 20:28:27 UTC (1,834 KB)
[v5] Wed, 18 Jun 2025 20:46:47 UTC (1,834 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-11
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号