Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2103.02874

Help | Advanced Search

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:2103.02874 (physics)
[Submitted on 4 Mar 2021 ]

Title: A study of Type B uncertainties associated with the photoelectric effect in low-energy Monte Carlo simulations

Title: 关于低能蒙特卡罗模拟中光电效应相关类型B不确定性的研究

Authors:Christian Valdes-Cortez, Iymad Mansour, Mark J. Rivard, Facundo Ballester, Ernesto Mainegra-Hing, Rowan M. Thomson, Javier Vijande
Abstract: The goal of this manuscript is to estimate Type B uncertainties in absorbed-dose calculations arising from the different implementations in current state-of-the-art Monte Carlo codes of low-energy photon cross-sections (<200 keV). Monte Carlo simulations are carried out using three codes widely used in the low-energy domain: PENELOPE-2018, EGSnrc, and MCNP. Mass energy-absorption coefficients for water, air, graphite, and their respective ratios; absorbed dose; and photon-fluence spectra are considered. Benchmark simulations using similar cross-sections have been performed. The differences observed between these quantities when different cross-sections are considered are taken to be a good estimator for the corresponding Type B uncertainties. A conservative Type B uncertainty for the absorbed dose (k=2) of 1.2%-1.7% (<50 keV), 0.6%-1.2% (50-100 keV), and 0.3% (100-200 keV) is estimated. The photon-fluence spectrum does not present clinically relevant differences that merit considering additional Type B uncertainties except for energies below 25 keV, where a Type B uncertainty of 0.5% is obtained. Below 30 keV, mass energy-absorption coefficients show Type B uncertainties (k=2) of about 1.5% (water and air), and 2% (graphite), reaching values about 1% (40-50 keV) and 0.5% (50-75 keV). Type B uncertainties for the water-to-graphite ratios are observed for energies below 30 keV, about 0.7% (k=2). In contrast with the intermediate (about 500 keV) or high (about 1 MeV) energy domains, Type B uncertainties due to the different cross-sections implementation cannot be considered subdominant with respect to Type A uncertainties or even to other sources of Type B uncertainties. Therefore, the values reported here should be accommodated within the uncertainty budget in low-energy photon dosimetry studies.
Abstract: 本文的目的是估算在当前最先进的蒙特卡罗代码中低能光子截面的不同实现所引起的吸收剂量计算中的B类不确定度(<200 keV)。使用三种在低能领域广泛使用的代码进行蒙特卡罗模拟:PENELOPE-2018、EGSnrc和MCNP。考虑了水、空气、石墨及其相应比值的质量能量吸收系数;吸收剂量;以及光子通量谱。进行了使用相似截面的基准模拟。当考虑不同截面时,这些量之间的差异被视为相应B类不确定度的良好估计。估计了吸收剂量的保守B类不确定度(k=2)为1.2%-1.7%(<50 keV)、0.6%-1.2%(50-100 keV)和0.3%(100-200 keV)。光子通量谱在低于25 keV的能量下没有临床上相关的差异,因此无需考虑额外的B类不确定度,此时得到的B类不确定度为0.5%。低于30 keV时,质量能量吸收系数显示出B类不确定度(k=2)约为1.5%(水和空气),以及2%(石墨),在40-50 keV时达到约1%,在50-75 keV时达到约0.5%。在低于30 keV的能量下观察到水与石墨比值的B类不确定度,约为0.7%(k=2)。与中间(约500 keV)或高能(约1 MeV)领域相反,由于不同截面实现导致的B类不确定度不能被视为相对于A类不确定度或其他B类不确定度的次级因素。因此,此处报告的数值应在低能光子剂量学研究的不确定度预算中予以考虑。
Comments: To be published in Physics in Medicine and Biology
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2103.02874 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:2103.02874v1 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.02874
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/abebfd
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Javier Vijande Asenjo [view email]
[v1] Thu, 4 Mar 2021 07:42:38 UTC (1,766 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-03
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号