Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > stat > arXiv:2412.00753

Help | Advanced Search

Statistics > Applications

arXiv:2412.00753 (stat)
[Submitted on 1 Dec 2024 (v1) , last revised 16 Apr 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title: The ecological forecast limit revisited: Potential, actual and relative system predictability

Title: 重新审视生态预测的限制:潜力、实际性和相对系统可预测性

Authors:Marieke Wesselkamp, Jakob Albrecht, Ewan Pinnington, William J. Castillo, Florian Pappenberger, Carsten F. Dormann
Abstract: Ecological forecasts are model-based statements about currently unknown ecosystem states in time or space. For a model forecast to be useful to inform decision makers, model validation and verification determine adequateness. The measure of forecast goodness that can be translated into a limit up to which a forecast is acceptable is known as the 'forecast limit'. While verification in weather forecasting follows strict criteria with established metrics and forecast limits, assessments of ecological forecasting models still remain experiment-specific, and forecast limits are rarely reported. As such, users of ecological forecasts remain uninformed of how far into the future statements can be trusted. In this work, we synthesise existing approaches to define empirical forecast limits in a unified framework for assessing ecological predictability and offer recipes for their computation. We distinguish the model's potential and absolute forecast limit, and show how a benchmark model can help determine its relative forecast limit. The approaches are demonstrated with three case studies from population, ecosystem, and Earth system research. We found that forecast limits can be computed with three requirements: A verification reference, a scoring function, and a predictive error tolerance. Within our framework, forecast limits are defined for practically any ecological forecast and support research on ecological predictability analysis.
Abstract: 生态预测是关于时间或空间上目前未知的生态系统状态的基于模型的陈述。为了使模型预测对决策者有用,模型验证和确认决定了其充分性。可以转化为预报可接受范围上限的预报优度衡量标准被称为“预报限制”。虽然天气预报中的验证遵循严格的准则,并有既定的指标和预报限制,但对生态预测模型的评估仍然特定于实验,并且很少报告预报限制。因此,生态预测的使用者无法了解预报可以在多大程度上被信任。在这项工作中,我们综合了现有的方法,在一个统一的框架内定义经验预报限制,以评估生态预测性,并提供了计算这些预报限制的方法。我们区分了模型的潜在预报限制和绝对预报限制,并展示了基准模型如何帮助确定其相对预报限制。这些方法通过来自种群、生态系统和地球系统研究的三个案例研究进行了演示。我们发现,预报限制可以通过三个要求来计算:验证参考、评分函数和预测误差容限。在我们的框架内,预报限制被定义为适用于任何生态预报,并支持生态预测性分析的研究。
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP) ; Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an); Populations and Evolution (q-bio.PE); Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2412.00753 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:2412.00753v2 [stat.AP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.00753
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Marieke Wesselkamp [view email]
[v1] Sun, 1 Dec 2024 10:14:42 UTC (4,941 KB)
[v2] Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:56:10 UTC (7,550 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
stat.AP
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-12
Change to browse by:
physics
physics.data-an
q-bio
q-bio.PE
stat
stat.ME

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号