Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2502.02677

Help | Advanced Search

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:2502.02677 (physics)
[Submitted on 4 Feb 2025 ]

Title: Quality assurance and reporting for FLASH clinical trials:the experience of the FEATHER trial

Title: FLASH临床试验的质量保证和报告:FEATHER试验的经验

Authors:Isabella Colizzi, Robert Schaefer, Jonas Brueckner, Gaia Dellepiane, Martin Grossmann, Maximilan Koerner, Antony John Lomax, David Meer, Benno Rohrer, Carla Rohrer Bley, Michele Togno, Serena Psoroulas
Abstract: Research on ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiation therapy has indicated its potential to spare normal tissue while maintaining equivalent tumor control compared to conventional treatments. First clinical trials are underway. The randomized phase II/III FEATHER clinical trial at the Paul Scherrer Institute in collaboration with the University of Zurich Animal Hospital is one of the first curative domestic animal trials to be attempted, and it is designed to provide a good example for human trials. However, the lack of standardized quality assurance (QA) guidelines for FLASH clinical trials presents a significant challenge in trial design. This work aims to demonstrate the development and testing of QA and reporting procedures implemented in the FEATHER clinical trial. We have expanded the clinical QA program to include UHDR-specific QA and additional patient-specific QA. Furthermore, we have modified the monitor readout to enable time-resolved measurements, allowing delivery log files to be used for dose and dose rate recalculations. Finally, we developed a reporting strategy encompassing relevant parameters for retrospective studies. We evaluated our QA and reporting procedures with simulated treatments. This testing confirmed that our QA procedures effectively ensure the correct and safe delivery of the planned dose. Additionally, we demonstrated that we could reconstruct the delivered dose and dose rate using the delivery log files. We developed and used in practice a comprehensive QA and reporting protocol for a FLASH clinical trial at the Paul Scherrer Institute. This work aims to establish guidelines and standardize reporting practices for future advancements in the FLASH-RT field.
Abstract: 超高剂量率(UHDR)放射治疗的研究表明,与传统治疗相比,它在保持同等肿瘤控制的同时,具有保护正常组织的潜力。 首次临床试验正在进行中。 由保罗谢勒研究所与苏黎世大学动物医院合作进行的随机II/III期FEATHER临床试验是首批尝试的治愈性宠物动物试验之一,旨在为人类试验提供良好的范例。 然而,FLASH临床试验缺乏标准化的质量保证(QA)指南,这在试验设计中构成了重大挑战。 本研究旨在展示在FEATHER临床试验中实施的QA和报告程序的开发和测试。 我们扩大了临床QA计划,以包括UHDR特定的QA和额外的患者特定QA。 此外,我们修改了监测读数,以实现时间分辨测量,使交付日志文件可用于剂量和剂量率的重新计算。 最后,我们制定了一种涵盖回顾性研究相关参数的报告策略。 我们通过模拟治疗评估了我们的QA和报告程序。 这种测试证实了我们的QA程序能够有效确保计划剂量的正确和安全输送。 此外,我们展示了可以使用交付日志文件重建输送的剂量和剂量率。 我们在保罗谢勒研究所开发并实际应用了一个全面的FLASH临床试验QA和报告协议。 本研究旨在为FLASH-RT领域未来的进展建立指南并标准化报告实践。
Comments: 7 figures
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2502.02677 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:2502.02677v1 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.02677
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Isabella Colizzi [view email]
[v1] Tue, 4 Feb 2025 19:36:54 UTC (3,991 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-02
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号