Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > stat > arXiv:2504.21046

Help | Advanced Search

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:2504.21046 (stat)
[Submitted on 28 Apr 2025 ]

Title: Statistical comparison of Hidden Markov Models via Fragment Analysis

Title: 隐马尔可夫模型的片段分析统计比较

Authors:Carlos M. Hernandez-Suarez, Osval A. Montesinos-López
Abstract: Standard practice in Hidden Markov Model (HMM) selection favors the candidate with the highest full-sequence likelihood, although this is equivalent to making a decision based on a single realization. We introduce a \emph{fragment-based} framework that redefines model selection as a formal statistical comparison. For an unknown true model $\mathrm{HMM}_0$ and a candidate $\mathrm{HMM}_j$, let $\mu_j(r)$ denote the probability that $\mathrm{HMM}_j$ and $\mathrm{HMM}_0$ generate the same sequence of length~$r$. We show that if $\mathrm{HMM}_i$ is closer to $\mathrm{HMM}_0$ than $\mathrm{HMM}_j$, there exists a threshold $r^{*}$ -- often small -- such that $\mu_i(r)>\mu_j(r)$ for all $r\geq r^{*}$. Sampling $k$ independent fragments yields unbiased estimators $\hat{\mu}_j(r)$ whose differences are asymptotically normal, enabling a straightforward $Z$-test for the hypothesis $H_0\!:\,\mu_i(r)=\mu_j(r)$. By evaluating only short subsequences, the procedure circumvents full-sequence likelihood computation and provides valid $p$-values for model comparison.
Abstract: 在隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)选择中的标准做法是青睐具有最高全序列似然性的候选模型,尽管这等同于基于单一实现做出决策。 我们引入了一个 \emph{基于片段的} 框架,重新定义了模型选择为正式的统计比较。 对于一个未知的真实模型 $\mathrm{HMM}_0$ 和一个候选模型 $\mathrm{HMM}_j$,设 $\mu_j(r)$ 表示 $\mathrm{HMM}_j$ 和 $\mathrm{HMM}_0$ 生成相同长度为~$r$ 的序列的概率。 我们证明,如果$\mathrm{HMM}_i$比$\mathrm{HMM}_j$更接近$\mathrm{HMM}_0$,则存在一个阈值$r^{*}$——通常很小——使得对于所有$r\geq r^{*}$,$\mu_i(r)>\mu_j(r)$。 采样$k$个独立片段得到无偏估计量$\hat{\mu}_j(r)$,这些估计量的差异渐近正态,从而可以进行简单的$Z$检验以检验假设$H_0\!:\,\mu_i(r)=\mu_j(r)$。通过仅评估短子序列,该方法规避了全序列似然计算,并提供了有效的模型比较的$p$值。
Comments: Eight pages, 1 figure
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME) ; Statistics Theory (math.ST)
MSC classes: 62M05, 62F03, 62F12
Cite as: arXiv:2504.21046 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2504.21046v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.21046
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Carlos Hernandez-Suarez M [view email]
[v1] Mon, 28 Apr 2025 22:08:20 UTC (30 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-04
Change to browse by:
math
math.ST
stat
stat.TH

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号