Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2506.02208

Help | Advanced Search

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2506.02208 (cs)
[Submitted on 2 Jun 2025 ]

Title: KDRL: Post-Training Reasoning LLMs via Unified Knowledge Distillation and Reinforcement Learning

Title: KDRL:通过统一的知识蒸馏和强化学习对推理大模型进行后训练

Authors:Hongling Xu, Qi Zhu, Heyuan Deng, Jinpeng Li, Lu Hou, Yasheng Wang, Lifeng Shang, Ruifeng Xu, Fei Mi
Abstract: Recent advances in large language model (LLM) post-training have leveraged two distinct paradigms to enhance reasoning capabilities: reinforcement learning (RL) and knowledge distillation (KD). While RL enables the emergence of complex reasoning behaviors, it often suffers from low sample efficiency when the initial policy struggles to explore high-reward trajectories. Conversely, KD improves learning efficiency via mimicking the teacher model but tends to generalize poorly to out-of-domain scenarios. In this work, we present \textbf{KDRL}, a \textit{unified post-training framework} that jointly optimizes a reasoning model through teacher supervision (KD) and self-exploration (RL). Specifically, KDRL leverages policy gradient optimization to simultaneously minimize the reverse Kullback-Leibler divergence (RKL) between the student and teacher distributions while maximizing the expected rule-based rewards. We first formulate a unified objective that integrates GRPO and KD, and systematically explore how different KL approximations, KL coefficients, and reward-guided KD strategies affect the overall post-training dynamics and performance. Empirical results on multiple reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that KDRL outperforms GRPO and various KD baselines while achieving a favorable balance between performance and reasoning token efficiency. These findings indicate that integrating KD and RL serves as an effective and efficient strategy to train reasoning LLMs.
Abstract: 大型语言模型(LLM)后训练中的最新进展利用了两种不同的范式来增强推理能力:强化学习(RL)和知识蒸馏(KD)。 虽然 RL 能够促使复杂的推理行为出现,但它常常在初始策略难以探索高奖励轨迹时表现出样本效率低的问题。 相反,KD 通过模仿教师模型来提高学习效率,但往往在处理域外场景时泛化效果不佳。 在这项工作中,我们提出了\textbf{KDRL},一个联合通过教师监督(KD)和自我探索(RL)来优化推理模型的\textit{统一的后训练框架}。 具体来说,KDRL 利用策略梯度优化同时最小化学生和教师分布之间的反向 Kullback-Leibler 散度(RKL),同时最大化基于规则的期望奖励。 我们首先制定一个统一的目标,将 GRPO 和 KD 集成在一起,并系统地探索不同的 KL 近似方法、KL 系数以及基于奖励的 KD 策略如何影响整体后训练动态和性能。 多项推理基准测试的实证结果显示,KDRL 在性能和推理标记效率之间实现了有利的平衡,同时优于 GRPO 和各种 KD 基线。 这些发现表明,结合 KD 和 RL 是一种有效且高效的训练推理 LLM 的策略。
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG) ; Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2506.02208 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2506.02208v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.02208
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Hongling Xu [view email]
[v1] Mon, 2 Jun 2025 19:46:41 UTC (652 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-06
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.CL

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号