Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2509.19655

Help | Advanced Search

Computer Science > Data Structures and Algorithms

arXiv:2509.19655 (cs)
[Submitted on 24 Sep 2025 ]

Title: A Better-Than-$5/4$-Approximation for Two-Edge Connectivity

Title: 一种优于$5/4$的二边连通性近似方法

Authors:Felix Hommelsheim, Alexander Lindermayr, Zhenwei Liu
Abstract: The 2-Edge-Connected Spanning Subgraph Problem (2ECSS) is a fundamental problem in survivable network design. Given an undirected $2$-edge-connected graph, the goal is to find a $2$-edge-connected spanning subgraph with the minimum number of edges; a graph is 2-edge-connected if it is connected after the removal of any single edge. 2ECSS is APX-hard and has been extensively studied in the context of approximation algorithms. Very recently, Bosch-Calvo, Garg, Grandoni, Hommelsheim, Jabal Ameli, and Lindermayr showed the currently best-known approximation ratio of $\frac{5}{4}$ [STOC 2025]. This factor is tight for many of their techniques and arguments, and it was not clear whether $\frac{5}{4}$ can be improved. We break this natural barrier and present a $(\frac{5}{4} - \eta)$-approximation algorithm, for some constant $\eta \geq 10^{-6}$. On a high level, we follow the approach of previous works: take a triangle-free $2$-edge cover and transform it into a 2-edge-connected spanning subgraph by adding only a few additional edges. For $\geq \frac{5}{4}$-approximations, one can heavily exploit that a $4$-cycle in the 2-edge cover can ``buy'' one additional edge. This enables simple and nice techniques, but immediately fails for our improved approximation ratio. To overcome this, we design two complementary algorithms that perform well for different scenarios: one for few $4$-cycles and one for many $4$-cycles. Besides this, there appear more obstructions when breaching $\frac54$, which we surpass via new techniques such as colorful bridge covering, rich vertices, and branching gluing paths.
Abstract: 2-边连通生成子图问题(2ECSS)是容错网络设计中的一个基本问题。 给定一个无向$2$-边连通图,目标是找到一个边数最少的$2$-边连通生成子图;如果在删除任意一条边后图仍然连通,则该图是2-边连通的。 2ECSS是APX难问题,并且在近似算法的背景下被广泛研究。 最近,Bosch-Calvo、Garg、Grandoni、Hommelsheim、Jabal Ameli和Lindermayr展示了目前最好的近似比为$\frac{5}{4}$[STOC 2025]。 这个因子对于他们许多技术与论证来说是紧的,而且不清楚是否可以改进$\frac{5}{4}$。 我们打破了这一自然障碍,提出了一种$(\frac{5}{4} - \eta)$近似算法,其中$\eta \geq 10^{-6}$是某个常数。 从高层次来看,我们遵循了之前工作的思路:取一个不含三角形的$2$-边覆盖,并通过仅添加少量额外边将其转换为2-边连通的生成子图。 对于$\geq \frac{5}{4}$-近似,可以充分利用在2边覆盖中的$4$-环可以“购买”一个额外的边这一特性。 这使得简单且优美的技术成为可能,但立即在我们改进的近似比下失效。 为了克服这一点,我们设计了两个互补的算法,分别在不同场景下表现良好:一个用于少量$4$-环,另一个用于大量$4$-环。 除此之外,在突破$\frac54$时会出现更多的障碍,我们通过新的技术如彩色桥覆盖、丰富顶点和分支粘合路径来克服这些障碍。
Subjects: Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
Cite as: arXiv:2509.19655 [cs.DS]
  (or arXiv:2509.19655v1 [cs.DS] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.19655
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Alexander Lindermayr [view email]
[v1] Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:23:46 UTC (329 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.DS
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-09
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号