Skip to main content
CenXiv.org
This website is in trial operation, support us!
We gratefully acknowledge support from all contributors.
Contribute
Donate
cenxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2510.19281

Help | Advanced Search

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:2510.19281 (cs)
[Submitted on 22 Oct 2025 (v1) , last revised 26 Oct 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title: An Empirical Study of Bitwise Operators Intuitiveness through Performance Metrics

Title: 通过性能指标的位运算符直观性实证研究

Authors:Shubham Joshi
Abstract: Objectives: This study aims to investigate the readability and understandability of bitwise operators in programming, with the main hypothesis that there will be a difference in the performance metrics (response time and error rate) between participants exposed to various bitwise operators related questions and those who are not. Participants: Participants in this human research study include people without programming background, novice programmers, and university students with varying programming experience (from freshmen to PhD level). There were 23 participants in this study. Study Methods: This study uses a within-subjects experimental design to assess how people with diverse programming backgrounds understand and use bitwise operators. Participants complete tasks in a JavaScript program, and their task completion times and task accuracy are recorded for analysis. Findings: The results indicate that operators can be one of the factors predicting response time, showing a small but significant effect (R-squared = 0.032, F(1, 494) = 16.5, p < .001). Additionally, operators such as OR, NOT, and Left Shift showed statistical significance in task completion times compared to other operators. Conclusions: While the complexity of bitwise operators did not generally result in longer task completion times, certain operators were found to be less intuitive, suggesting the need for further investigation and potential redesign for improved understandability.
Abstract: 目标:本研究旨在调查编程中位运算符的可读性和可理解性,主要假设是暴露于与位运算符相关问题的参与者与未暴露的参与者在性能指标(反应时间和错误率)上存在差异。 参与者:本人体研究的参与者包括没有编程背景的人、初级程序员以及具有不同编程经验的大学生(从新生到博士水平)。 本研究共有23名参与者。 研究方法:本研究采用被试内实验设计,以评估具有不同编程背景的人如何理解和使用位运算符。 参与者完成JavaScript程序中的任务,并记录任务完成时间和任务准确性以进行分析。 发现:结果表明,运算符可能是预测反应时间的因素之一,显示出一个小但显著的效果(R平方=0.032,F(1, 494)=16.5,p < .001)。 此外,与其它运算符相比,OR、NOT和左移运算符在任务完成时间上显示出统计学意义。 结论:尽管位运算符的复杂性通常不会导致更长的任务完成时间,但某些运算符被发现不太直观,这表明需要进一步研究并可能重新设计以提高可理解性。
Comments: 15 pages, 10 tables, 9 Figures
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE) ; Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Programming Languages (cs.PL)
Cite as: arXiv:2510.19281 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:2510.19281v2 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.19281
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Shubham Joshi [view email]
[v1] Wed, 22 Oct 2025 06:30:49 UTC (530 KB)
[v2] Sun, 26 Oct 2025 04:37:45 UTC (528 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled
  • View Chinese PDF
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-10
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CR
cs.PL

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack

京ICP备2025123034号