标题： ReviewCoin：为真实工作付费 显示英文标题

标题： ReviewCoin: Paying for Real Work

摘要： 同行评审过程已经破裂，而且问题正在恶化，尤其是在人工智能领域：像NeurIPS这样的大型会议越来越难以充分审查大量论文提交。 我提出了一种可扩展的解决方案，首要的是认识到评审工作的重要性、必要性， \emph{工作}并通过由会议自身拥有和管理的加密货币来奖励评审工作。 这个想法本质上非常简单：论文提交需要完成工作（评审、元评审等）， 因此提交者必须为此工作付费。 每位评审员将其评审提交给指定的会议官员（例如程序委员会主席、领域主席等）审批，一旦获得批准，即可获得一枚硬币作为单次评审的报酬。 如果需要三篇评审，则提交费用应为三枚硬币+涵盖所有志愿者组织会议所需支付的税款。 在公平分配硬币的一次性启动成本之后，随着会议的增长，只有在需要时才会铸造新的硬币，整个过程应该相对稳定。 显示英文摘要

摘要： The peer-review process is broken and the problem is getting worse, especially in AI: large conferences like NeurIPS increasingly struggle to adequately review huge numbers of paper submissions. I propose a scalable solution that, foremost, recognizes reviewing as important, necessary, \emph{work} and rewards it with crypto-coins owned and managed by the conferences themselves. The idea is at its core quite simple: paper submissions require work (reviews, meta-reviews, etc.) to be done, and therefore the submitter must pay for that work. Each reviewer submits their review to be approved by some designated conference officer (e.g. PC chair, Area Chair, etc.), and upon approval is paid a single coin for a single review. If three reviews are required, the cost of submission should be three coins + a tax that covers payments to all the volunteers who organize the conference. After some one-time startup costs to fairly distribute coins, the process should be relatively stable with new coins minted only when a conference grows.