标题： 逻辑和与太阳中微子相关的数字 显示英文标题

标题： Logic and numbers related to solar neutrinos

摘要： 在这项工作中，首先我们分析了粒子振荡概念的一些隐藏方面。 这一概念中不符合最小作用量原理的关键要素是盖耳-梅因和佩恩斯引入的中性$K$-介子混合粒子的概念。 已经证明，在电子中微子产生的过程中，能量-动量守恒定律不允许基于格里博夫和庞特科尔沃关于其振荡假设来解决太阳中微子问题。 已经确定沃尔芬斯坦方程的结果与萨诺和超级神冈合作组的结果相矛盾，并且米赫耶夫和斯米尔诺夫关于太阳中微子转换的断言是错误的。 工作的另一部分致力于根据存在新相互作用的假设对该问题进行逻辑清晰的解答，该假设的载体是一种无质量的赝标量玻色子，它与电子中微子和核子具有杨耦合。 在每次太阳核子引起的电子中微子相互作用事件中，由于这种相互作用，中微子的手征性从左变为右，反之亦然，同时中微子的能量也减少。 该假设使得所有五个观测到的涉及太阳中微子的过程的理论值和实验值速率之间具有良好的一致性。 这为太阳中微子问题解决方案的信心以及新相互作用存在的信心提供了重要的标准。 显示英文摘要

摘要： In this work, first of all, we analyze a number of hidden aspects of the concept of particle oscillations. The key element of this concept, which do not comply with the principle of least action, is the notion of a mixture of particles, introduced by Gell-Mann and Pais for neutral $K$-mesons. It has been proven that the law of conservation of energy-momentum in the processes of electron neutrino production does not allow solving the problem of solar neutrinos based on the assumption of Gribov and Pontecorvo about their oscillations. It has been established that the consequences of Wolfenstein's equation contradict the results of the SNO and Super-Kamiokande collaborations and that the assertion by Mikheev and Smirnov on the conversion of solar neutrinos is erroneous. Another part of the work is devoted to a logically clear solution to this problem based on the hypothesis of the existence of a new interaction, the carrier of which is a massless pseudoscalar boson, which has a Yukawa coupling with electron neutrinos and nucleons. At each act of interaction of an electron neutrino with the nucleons of the Sun, caused by such interaction, the handedness of the neutrino changes from left to right and vice versa, and also the neutrino energy decreases. The hypothesis provides good agreement between the theoretical and experimental values of the rates of all five observed processes with solar neutrinos. This serves as a significant criterion for both the confidence of such a solution to the problem of solar neutrinos and the confidence of the existence of a new interaction.